These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652022)

  • 21. Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases.
    Bopp J; Coleson RE
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(4):821-46. PubMed ID: 11652997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria?
    Longino PH
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):377-407. PubMed ID: 11658479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Baby Doe cases: compromise and moral dilemma.
    Haddon PA
    Emory Law J; 1985; 34(3-4):545-615. PubMed ID: 11658790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. British judges cannot order doctors to treat.
    Kessel R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(4):3-4. PubMed ID: 11643015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. When should the state step aside? Terminating treatment for PVS victims.
    Harvey JC; Quinn KP; Johnson SH
    Commonweal; 1990 May; 117(9):286-94. PubMed ID: 11652558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. If this baby could choose.
    Meilaender G
    Linacre Q; 1982 Nov; 49(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 11649599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A halakhic ethic of care for the terminally ill.
    Reisner AI
    Conserv Jud; 1991; 43(3):52-89. PubMed ID: 11651009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative.
    Rubin BL
    Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1985; 19(1):19-68. PubMed ID: 11658755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Withholding medical treatment from infants: when is it child neglect?
    Knepper K
    Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1994-1995 Winter; 33(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11653286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention.
    Riga PJ
    Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Moral reasoning and legal change: observations on the termination of medical treatment and the development of law.
    Jarrett C
    Rutgers Law J; 1988; 19(4):999-1028. PubMed ID: 11650183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Decision-making in terminal care: the days of one's life and the life of one's days.
    Dickens BM
    Sask Law Rev; 1986-1987; 51(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11652507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The future of Baby Doe.
    Singer P; Kuhse H
    New York Rev Books; 1984 Mar; 31(3):17-22. PubMed ID: 11658414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference.
    Richard SM
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. What role for surrogate decision makers?
    Hubbard H
    Origins; 1993 Feb; 22(34):576-9. PubMed ID: 11652129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. June 8, 1982, letter of Judge John Baker to Anonymous Person.
    Baker JG
    Issues Law Med; 1986 Jul; 2(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 11644060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Court permits doctors not to resuscitate gravely handicapped infant.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Nov; No. 63():22-3. PubMed ID: 11651089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Law, medicine, and morality: the cases of Infant Doe and Pamela Hamilton.
    Klinefelter D
    J Law Relig; 1984; 2(2):413-27. PubMed ID: 11651848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing quality of life: a response to Professor Kamisar.
    Robertson JA
    Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1243-52. PubMed ID: 11652582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Raising the stakes in the euthanasia debate: judge rules on Washington law.
    Mahoney R;
    Origins; 1994 May; 24(2):17, 19-20. PubMed ID: 11652727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.