186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652074)
1. Allocating the costs of parental free exercise: striking a new balance between sincere religious belief and a child's right to medical treatment.
Monopoli PA
Pepperdine Law Rev; 1991; 18(2):319-52. PubMed ID: 11652074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abraham, Isaac and the state: faith healing and legal intervention.
Abraham HJ
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1993; 27(5):951-87. PubMed ID: 11652734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Commonwealth v. Twitchell: who owns the child?
Robinson SD
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991; 7():413-32. PubMed ID: 11645693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Withholding medical care for religious reasons.
Flowers RB
J Relig Health; 1984; 23(4):268-82. PubMed ID: 11658865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The conflict between child's medical needs and parents' religious beliefs.
Probst JE
Am J Fam Law; 1990; 4(2):175-92. PubMed ID: 11652023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Parental rights and children's best interests: United States.
McBride G
BMJ; 1990 Jun; 300(6741):1673-4. PubMed ID: 11642789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Death and faith, law and Christian Science.
Margolick D
N Y Times Web; 1990 Aug; ():A1, A11. PubMed ID: 11646777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. "In God we trust": when parents refuse medical treatment for their children based upon their sincere religious beliefs.
Plastine LM
Const Law J; 1993; 3(1):123-60. PubMed ID: 12083094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Putting square pegs in a round hole: procedural due process and the effect of faith healing exemptions on the prosecution of faith healing parents.
Rosato JL
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1994; 29(1):43-119. PubMed ID: 11654737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Religious healing in the courts: the liberties and liabilities of patients, parents, and healers.
Nobel B
Univ Puget Sound Law Rev; 1993; 16():599-710. PubMed ID: 11652680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Commonwealth v. Twitchell.
Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Suffolk
North East Rep Second Ser; 1993 Aug; 617():609-21. PubMed ID: 12041213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Freedom of religion versus civil authority in matters of health.
Flowers RB
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci; 1979 Nov; 446():149-61. PubMed ID: 11651749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In re Dubreuil: is an individual's right to refuse a blood transfusion contingent on parental status?
Bamonte JL; Bierman C
Nova Law Rev; 1992; 17(1):517-47. PubMed ID: 11659589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Court decides Christian Scientist can be tried in her child's death.
Steinfels P
N Y Times Web; 1988 Nov; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11646708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical decision making for and by children: tensions between parent, state, and child.
Wadlington W
Univ Ill Law Rev; 1994; 2():311-36. PubMed ID: 11659988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Jehovah's Witnesses and blood transfusion.
Watson SB
Clin Ethics Rep; 1991; 5(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 11653954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. When parents choose prayer over medicine, should courts step in?
Levine C
Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Feb; 14(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 11644130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The approach to the Jehovah's Witness patient.
Rothenberg DM
Anesthesiol Clin North Am; 1990 Sep; 8(3):589-607. PubMed ID: 11653928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Praying for relief from parens patriae: should a child be allowed to refuse life-saving medical treatment on religious grounds?
Kessler DN
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):673-93. PubMed ID: 11650888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. State v. McKown.
Minnesota. Supreme Court
Wests North West Rep; 1991 Sep; 475():63-71. PubMed ID: 12041164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
