291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652079)
1. Fetal protection and freedom of contract.
Paul EF
Public Aff Q; 1992 Jul; 6(3):305-26. PubMed ID: 11652079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. From spiritual descriptions to legal prescriptions: religious imagery of women as "fetal container" in the law.
Peach LJ
J Law Relig; 1993-1994; 10(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 11656314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Fetal protection policies in the workplace: continuing controversy in light of Johnson Controls.
Blank R
Politics Life Sci; 1992 Aug; 11(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 11659520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fetal protection: law, ethics and corporate policy.
Sprotzer I; Goldberg IV
J Bus Ethics; 1992 Oct; 11(10):731-5. PubMed ID: 11652069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The toxic workplace: Title VII protection for the potentially pregnant person.
Andrade VM
Harv Womens Law J; 1981; 4(1):71-105. PubMed ID: 11649449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Firing the woman to protect the fetus: the reconciliation of fetal protection with employment opportunity goals under Title VII.
Williams WW
Georgetown Law J; 1981 Feb; 69(3):641-704. PubMed ID: 11649426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Getting beyond discrimination: a regulatory solution to the problem of fetal hazards in the workplace.
Buss E
Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):577-98. PubMed ID: 11658700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Shared interests: promoting healthy births without sacrificing women's liberty.
Johnsen D
Hastings Law J; 1992 Mar; 43(3):569-614. PubMed ID: 11652106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Women's job rights collide with fears of birth defects.
Kilborn PT
N Y Times Web; 1990 Sep; ():1, 28. PubMed ID: 11646784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. UAW v. Johnson Controls: gender discrimination in the fetotoxic workplace.
Brown JW
Rutgers Law Rev; 1992; 44(2):479-529. PubMed ID: 11651453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. International Union, UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
U.S. Supreme Court
Wests Supreme Court Report; 1991 Mar; 111():1196-217. PubMed ID: 12041279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new crime, fetal neglect: state intervention to protect the unborn--protection at what cost?
Manson R; Marolt J
Calif West Law Rev; 1987-1988; 24(1):161-82. PubMed ID: 11650070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Protecting us to death: women, pregnancy, and clinical research trials.
Charo RA
St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):135-87. PubMed ID: 11656322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fetal exclusion policies and gendered constructions of suitable work.
Draper E
Soc Probl; 1993 Feb; 40(1):90-107. PubMed ID: 11652221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Criminal liability for substance abuse during pregnancy: the controversy of maternal v. fetal rights.
Dobson T; Eby KK
St Louis Univ Law J; 1992; 36(3):655-94. PubMed ID: 11659686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. From the workplace to the delivery room: protecting the fetus in the post-Roe era.
Maschke KJ
Politics Life Sci; 1993 Feb; 12(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 11656400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Protecting the baby: work in pregnancy poses legal frontier.
Lewin T
N Y Times Web; 1988 Aug; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11646717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Court voids limits to women in jobs on basis of fetus.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1991 Mar; ():A1, B12. PubMed ID: 11646829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Gender matters: implications for clinical research and women's health care.
Rothenberg KH
Houst Law Rev; 1996 Symposium; 32(5):1201-72. PubMed ID: 11660524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Notes from the field: a reply to Professor Colker.
Burns SE
Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():189-206. PubMed ID: 11656054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
