290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652079)
21. The fetus and the law--whose life is it anyway?
Gallagher J
Ms; 1984 Sep; 13(3):62, 64, 66+. PubMed ID: 11655606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court.
Linton PB
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Protecting "pregnant persons": women's equality and reproductive freedom.
Ellis DA
Const Law J; 1996; 6():967-77. PubMed ID: 11657887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The evolution of the right to privacy after Roe v. Wade.
Barnard D
Am J Law Med; 1987; 13(2 3):365-525. PubMed ID: 11659051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Regulating women's bodies: the adverse effect of fetal rights theory on childbirth decisions and women of color.
Krauss DJ
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1991; 26(2):523-47. PubMed ID: 11652068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Fetal protection programs under Title VII--rebutting the procreation assumption.
Blanco AC
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1985; 46(3):755-94. PubMed ID: 11649206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Abortion compromise -- inevitable and impossible.
Law SA
Univ Ill Law Rev; 1992; 25(4):921-41. PubMed ID: 11656296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The creation of fetal rights: conflicts with women's constitutional rights to liberty, privacy, and equal protection.
Johnsen DE
Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):599-625. PubMed ID: 11658701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Judicial intervention in pregnancy.
Martin S; Coleman M
McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):947-91. PubMed ID: 11654475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Envisioning a future for reproductive liberty: strategies for making the rights real.
Pine RN; Law SA
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1992; 27(2):407-63. PubMed ID: 11656200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Where privacy fails: equal protection and the abortion rights of minors.
Schmidt CG
N Y Univ Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 68(3):597-638. PubMed ID: 11659822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Genetic testing in the workplace.
Rowinski L
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():375-413. PubMed ID: 11645613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights?
Gallagher J
Harv Womens Law J; 1987; 10():9-58. PubMed ID: 11649954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. A feminist response to 'Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution.
Dawson TB
Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 11656495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Abortion rights in America.
Bullock JR
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1994; 1994(1):63-94. PubMed ID: 11656488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Reasoning from the body: a historical perspective on abortion regulation and questions of equal protection.
Siegel R
Stanford Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 44(2):261-381. PubMed ID: 11656213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Can employers exclude women to protect children?
Becker ME
JAMA; 1990 Oct 24-31; 264(16):2113-7. PubMed ID: 2214080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Abortion and democracy for women: a critique of Tremblay v. Daigle.
Greschner D
McGill Law J; 1990 Sep; 35(3):633-69. PubMed ID: 11656074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Some thoughts on autonomy and equality in relation to Roe v. Wade.
Ginsburg RB
North Carol Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 63(2):375-86. PubMed ID: 11656660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. International Union, UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Fed Report; 1989 Sep; 886():871-921. PubMed ID: 11648148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
