159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652121)
1. Japanese attitudes toward assisted procreation.
Shirai Y
J Law Med Ethics; 1993; 21(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 11652121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A survey of public attitudes towards third-party reproduction in Japan in 2014.
Yamamoto N; Hirata T; Izumi G; Nakazawa A; Fukuda S; Neriishi K; Arakawa T; Takamura M; Harada M; Hirota Y; Koga K; Wada-Hiraike O; Fujii T; Irahara M; Osuga Y
PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0198499. PubMed ID: 30379816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bioethics in artificial reproduction in the Muslim world.
Serour GI
Bioethics; 1993 Apr; 7(2-3):207-17. PubMed ID: 11651533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproductive technology: in Japan, consensus has limits.
Bai K; Shirai Y; Ishii M
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S18-20. PubMed ID: 11644024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Egg donation, motherhood and state law reform: a commentary on Professor Palmer's proposals.
Strouse DS
Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):31-49. PubMed ID: 11660335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A rejoinder.
Palmer LI
Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 11660336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Who are the parents of biotechnological children?
Palmer LI
Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 11660334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Legal aspects of artificial human reproduction: can the law afford to play ostrich?
Clapshaw D
Auckl Univ Law Rev; 1982 Jun; 4(3):254-72. PubMed ID: 11658651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificially assisted conception.
Long LL
Health Law Can; 1985; 5(4):89-107. PubMed ID: 11645666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act.
;
Fam Law Rep (Wash D C); 1989 Feb; 15(16):2009-16. PubMed ID: 11659181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproductive technology and the procreation rights of the unmarried.
Harv Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 98(3):669-85. PubMed ID: 11649801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The new reproductive technologies and the law: a Roman Catholic perspective.
Wagner WJ
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():37-70. PubMed ID: 11645612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The attitudes of the Australian community to treatment of infertility by in vitro fertilization and associated procedures.
Kovacs GT; Wood C; Morgan G; Brumby M
J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf; 1985 Dec; 2(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 4093704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Whose child is it anyway?
Platt EF
Med Leg J; 1994; 62 ( Pt 4)():180-97. PubMed ID: 7845312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro fertilization and surrogate motherhood: the Jewish view.
Rosner F
J Relig Health; 1983; 22(2):139-60. PubMed ID: 11658738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In-vitro fertilization (IVF), embryo transfer (ET) and assisted reproduction in the State of Israel.
Schenker JG
Hum Reprod; 1987 Nov; 2(8):755-8. PubMed ID: 11644108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Assisted conception.
Craft I
Med Leg J; 1992; 58(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 11659676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Austria: a legal ban on surrogate mothers and fathers?
Bernat E; Straka U
J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Spring; 31(2):267-82. PubMed ID: 11660068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Artificial conception: the challenge for family law.
Wadlington W
Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):465-514. PubMed ID: 11651807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act.
Abbas J
Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
