158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652152)
1. Improving the readability of informed consent documents.
Heinze-Lacey B; Saunders C; Sugar A
IRB; 1993; 15(3):10-1. PubMed ID: 11652152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving readability of consent forms: what the computers may not tell you.
Peterson BT; Clancy SJ; Champion K; McLarty JW
IRB; 1992; 14(6):6-8. PubMed ID: 11651464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Some overlooked aspects of consent form readability.
Hochhauser M
IRB; 1997; 19(5):5-9. PubMed ID: 11655186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Informed consent readability: subject understanding of 15 common consent form phrases.
Lawson SL; Adamson HM
IRB; 1995; 17(5-6):16-9. PubMed ID: 11653358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Informed consent documents: increasing comprehension by reducing reading level.
Young DR; Hooker DT; Freeberg FE
IRB; 1990; 12(3):1-5. PubMed ID: 11651387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhancing comprehension of information for informed consent: a review of empirical research.
Silva MC; Sorrell JM
IRB; 1988; 10(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11658988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Are research participants truly informed? Readability of informed consent forms used in research.
Ogloff JR; Otto RK
Ethics Behav; 1991; 1(4):239-52. PubMed ID: 11651140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Who understands? II: A survey of 27 words, phrases, or symbols used in proposed clinical research consent forms.
Waggoner WC; Sherman BB
IRB; 1996; 18(3):8-10. PubMed ID: 11654410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Informed consent and patient's rights documents: a right, a rite, or a rewrite?
Hochhauser M
Ethics Behav; 1999; 9(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 11657485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed consent for research: a study to evaluate readability and processability to effect change.
Philipson SJ; Doyle MA; Gabram SG; Nightingale C; Philipson EH
J Investig Med; 1995 Oct; 43(5):459-67. PubMed ID: 8528757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Consent forms: how to determine and improve their readability.
Meade CD; Howser DM
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1992; 19(10):1523-8. PubMed ID: 1461766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Toward an informed discussion of informed consent: a review and critique of the empirical studies.
Meisel A; Roth LH
Ariz Law Rev; 1983; 25(2):265-346. PubMed ID: 11658677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comprehension of informed consent for research: issues and directions for future study.
Taub HA
IRB; 1986; 8(6):7-10. PubMed ID: 11649821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Who understands? A survey of 25 words or phrases commonly used in proposed clinical research consent forms.
Waggoner WC; Mayo DM
IRB; 1995; 17(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 11653061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An IRB's consent form survey.
Lewis JH
IRB; 1984; 6(4):10. PubMed ID: 11649561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. What kinds of subjects can understand this protocol?
Levine RJ
IRB; 1984; 6(5):6-8. PubMed ID: 11650664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Power, advocacy, and informed consent forms.
Smith ML
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11653311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A strategy for learning principles and elements of informed consent.
Christenbery TL; Miller MR
Nurse Educ; 2008; 33(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 18317319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How to make consent forms more readable.
Grundner TM
IRB; 1981; 3(7):9-10. PubMed ID: 11649400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. "Therapeutic misconception" and "recruiting doublespeak" in the informed consent process.
Hochhauser M
IRB; 2002; 24(1):11-2. PubMed ID: 14509292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
