180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652221)
1. Fetal exclusion policies and gendered constructions of suitable work.
Draper E
Soc Probl; 1993 Feb; 40(1):90-107. PubMed ID: 11652221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Firing the woman to protect the fetus: the reconciliation of fetal protection with employment opportunity goals under Title VII.
Williams WW
Georgetown Law J; 1981 Feb; 69(3):641-704. PubMed ID: 11649426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Getting beyond discrimination: a regulatory solution to the problem of fetal hazards in the workplace.
Buss E
Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):577-98. PubMed ID: 11658700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The toxic workplace: Title VII protection for the potentially pregnant person.
Andrade VM
Harv Womens Law J; 1981; 4(1):71-105. PubMed ID: 11649449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Fetal protection and freedom of contract.
Paul EF
Public Aff Q; 1992 Jul; 6(3):305-26. PubMed ID: 11652079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. UAW v. Johnson Controls: gender discrimination in the fetotoxic workplace.
Brown JW
Rutgers Law Rev; 1992; 44(2):479-529. PubMed ID: 11651453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Women's job rights collide with fears of birth defects.
Kilborn PT
N Y Times Web; 1990 Sep; ():1, 28. PubMed ID: 11646784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reasoning from the body: a historical perspective on abortion regulation and questions of equal protection.
Siegel R
Stanford Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 44(2):261-381. PubMed ID: 11656213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Fetal protection: law, ethics and corporate policy.
Sprotzer I; Goldberg IV
J Bus Ethics; 1992 Oct; 11(10):731-5. PubMed ID: 11652069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Protecting workers from reproductive hazards.
Levitsky M
Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):488-97. PubMed ID: 11651101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal protection programs under Title VII--rebutting the procreation assumption.
Blanco AC
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1985; 46(3):755-94. PubMed ID: 11649206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Court voids limits to women in jobs on basis of fetus.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1991 Mar; ():A1, B12. PubMed ID: 11646829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fetal rights: a new assault on feminism.
Pollitt K
Nation; 1990 Mar; 250(12):409-411, 414-416, 418. PubMed ID: 11656424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fetal protection policies in the workplace: continuing controversy in light of Johnson Controls.
Blank R
Politics Life Sci; 1992 Aug; 11(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 11659520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. From spiritual descriptions to legal prescriptions: religious imagery of women as "fetal container" in the law.
Peach LJ
J Law Relig; 1993-1994; 10(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 11656314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetic secrets: social issues of medical screening in a genetic age.
Draper E
Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(4 Suppl):S15-8. PubMed ID: 11652052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Protecting the baby: work in pregnancy poses legal frontier.
Lewin T
N Y Times Web; 1988 Aug; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11646717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Prenatal exposure to fetally toxic work environments: the dilemma of the 1978 Pregnancy Amendment to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Furnish HA
Iowa Law Rev; 1980 Oct; 66(1):63-129. PubMed ID: 11661992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Making healthy babies.
Henifin MS; Bertin J
Sci People; 1984; 16(2):18-22. PubMed ID: 11649543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. International Union, UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
U.S. Supreme Court
Wests Supreme Court Report; 1991 Mar; 111():1196-217. PubMed ID: 12041279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
