These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652221)

  • 21. Unraveling compromise.
    Olsen F
    Harv Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 103(1):105-35. PubMed ID: 11655993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fetal protection policies: a method of safeguarding fetuses or a way of limiting women in the workplace?
    Hoffman H
    J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Jul; 23(7):193-207, 213, 224. PubMed ID: 10105492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. "Fetal rights" and the new eugenics.
    Hubbard R
    Sci People; 1984; 16(2):7-9, 27-29. PubMed ID: 11649544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable.
    Heller S
    Washburn Law J; 1990; 30(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11659579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reproductive laws, women of color, and low-income women.
    Nsiah-Jefferson L
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1989; 11(1):15-38. PubMed ID: 11656016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fathers and fetuses.
    Davis DL
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Mar; ():A27. PubMed ID: 11646240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The invisible woman: gender bias in medical research.
    Keville TD
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1994; 15():123-42. PubMed ID: 11660409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Should mom be constrained in the best interests of the fetus?
    King P
    Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):393-404. PubMed ID: 11650348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Doctors, patients and the Constitution: a theoretical analysis of the physician's role in "private" reproductive decisions.
    Appleton SF
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1985; 63(2):183-236. PubMed ID: 11656658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Biological monitoring: the employer's dilemma.
    Miller FH
    Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):388-426. PubMed ID: 11644166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Health, equity, and reproductive risks in the workplace.
    Daniels CR; Paul M; Rosofsky R
    J Public Health Policy; 1990; 11(4):449-62. PubMed ID: 2289955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fertility may be hazardous to your job.
    Rosenfeld A
    Saturday Rev; 1979 Apr; 6(9):12-3. PubMed ID: 11660935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sex as contract: abortion and expanded choice.
    Feaver PD; Kling R; Plofchan TK
    Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1992-1993 Winter; 4():211-20. PubMed ID: 11652652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Off the pedestal and into the arena: toward including women in experimental protocols.
    Gorenberg H; White A
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(1):205-46. PubMed ID: 11659599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How not to promote serious deliberation about abortion.
    McConnell MW
    Univ Chic Law Rev; 1991; 58(3):1181-202. PubMed ID: 11656153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pregnant women's rights and the legal impact of theories of when life begins.
    Crepps J; Miller A
    Am J Ethics Med; 1994; 3(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 11652827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Abortion: the father's rights.
    Gilbert RA
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1973; 42(3):441-67. PubMed ID: 11664234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The proposed equal protection fix for abortion law: reflections on citizenship, gender, and the Constitution.
    Allen AL
    Harv J Law Public Policy; 1995; 18(21):419-55. PubMed ID: 11656571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers v. American Cyanamid Co.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
    Fed Report; 1984 Aug; 741():444-50. PubMed ID: 11648145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Funding of medically-necessary abortions: a reexamination of U.S. law and a call for EC federalism.
    Nishi J
    Univ Chic Leg Forum; 1992; [1992]():517-38. PubMed ID: 11652961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.