These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652259)
1. Crime, race, and reproduction. Roberts DE Tulane Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 67(6):1945-77. PubMed ID: 11652259 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Norplant meets the new eugenicists: the impermissibility of coerced contraception. Mertus J; Heller S St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):359-83. PubMed ID: 11652703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Norplant: the new scarlet letter? Flannery MT J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():201-26. PubMed ID: 11645739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Norplant debate: birth control or woman control? Spitz SS Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1993; 25(1):131-69. PubMed ID: 11652335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The creation and perpetuation of the mother/body myth: judicial and legislative enlistment of Norplant. Henley M Buffalo Law Rev; 1993; 41(2):703-77. PubMed ID: 11659736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Control of childbearing by HIV-positive women: some responses to emerging legal policies. Sangree S Buffalo Law Rev; 1993; 41(2):309-449. PubMed ID: 11659735 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Punishing drug addicts who have babies: women of color, equality, and the right of privacy. Roberts DE Harv Law Rev; 1991 May; 104(7):1419-82. PubMed ID: 11650979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Norplant condition: one step forward or two steps back? Ballard T Harv Womens Law J; 1993; 16():139-87. PubMed ID: 11652871 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Class, race, and poverty: medical technologies and socio-political choices. Bernier BL Harv Blacklett Law J; 1994; 11():115-43. PubMed ID: 11656593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Norplant condition: protecting the unborn or violating fundamental rights? Persels J J Leg Med; 1992 Jun; 13(2):237-62. PubMed ID: 11643010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproductive technologies and the law: Norplant and the bad mother. Young ME Marriage Fam Rev; 1995; 21(3-4):259-81. PubMed ID: 11654845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Norplant prescription: birth control, women control, or crime control? Arthur SL UCLA Law Rev; 1992 Oct; 40(1):1-101. PubMed ID: 11652185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Beyond survival: the procreative rights of women with HIV. Boockvar K Boston Coll Third World Law J; 1994; 14(1):1-42. PubMed ID: 11652889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Racial bias seen on pregnant addicts. Kolata G N Y Times Web; 1990 Jul; ():A13. PubMed ID: 11646778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Arming the pregnancy police: more outlandish concoctions? Parness JA LA Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 53(2):427-48. PubMed ID: 11657119 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prenatal drug exposure: the constitutional implications of three governmental approaches. Smith GB; Dabiri GM Const Law J; 1991; 2(1):53-126. PubMed ID: 12083093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Addicted pregnancy as a sex crime. Schmall L North Ill Univ Law Rev; 1993; 13(2):263-334. PubMed ID: 11656342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Regulating women's bodies: the adverse effect of fetal rights theory on childbirth decisions and women of color. Krauss DJ Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1991; 26(2):523-47. PubMed ID: 11652068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Substance abuse during pregnancy. Moss K Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():278-99. PubMed ID: 11656055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abusive prosecutors: race and class discretion and the prosecution of drug-addicted mothers. Greene DL Buffalo Law Rev; 1991; 39(3):737-802. PubMed ID: 11651490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]