BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652290)

  • 1. The role of federal regulations in assuring research integrity.
    Friedman PJ
    Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):111-6. PubMed ID: 11652290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The federal research misconduct regulations as viewed from the research universities.
    Wright DE
    Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):249-72. PubMed ID: 11656759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fraud and misrepresentation in research--whose rights?
    Schmaus W; Wigodsky HS
    IRB; 1984; 6(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 11650663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law.
    Sise CB
    San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ensuring scientific integrity in research: aspects of fairness and justice.
    Green HP
    Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):209-13. PubMed ID: 11652295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scientific misconduct: undue process.
    Efron R
    Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):223-38. PubMed ID: 11652297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
    Protti M
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions.
    Fox MF; Braxton JM
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deception in scientific research.
    Woolf PK
    Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Teaching scientific integrity.
    Gifford F
    Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):297-314. PubMed ID: 11656760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Institutional policies for responding to allegations of research fraud.
    Greene PJ; Durch JS; Horwitz W; Hooper VS
    IRB; 1986; 8(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11653742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. NSF's approach to misconduct in science.
    Buzzelli DE
    Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):215-21. PubMed ID: 11652296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fraud and misrepresentation in research--whose responsibility?
    Wigodsky HS
    IRB; 1984; 6(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The demise of the social contract for science: misconduct in science and the nonmodern world.
    Guston DH
    Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):215-48. PubMed ID: 11656758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Congressmen investigate scientific fraud.
    Perspectives Prof; 1981; 1(3-4):10-2. PubMed ID: 11649375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The politics of research misconduct: congressional oversight, universities, and science.
    LaFollette MC
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):261-85. PubMed ID: 11653364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fraud squad moves in on universities.
    Cross M; Connor S; Anderson I
    New Sci; 1985 Jun; 106(1459):8. PubMed ID: 11655696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
    Price AR
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A call for the development of "Good Research Practices" (GRP) guidelines.
    Glick JL; Shamoo AE
    Account Res; 1993; 2(4):231-5. PubMed ID: 11652143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.