BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652323)

  • 1. Medical insurance payments and patients involved in research.
    Holder AR
    IRB; 1994; 16(1-2):19-22. PubMed ID: 11652323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Who should rightfully decide whether a medical treatment necessarily incurred should be excluded from coverage under a health insurance policy provision which excludes from coverage "experimental" medical treatments?
    Fisfis BA
    Duquesne Law Rev; 1993; 31(4):777-800. PubMed ID: 11652669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Funding innovative medical treatment.
    Holder AR
    Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):795-810. PubMed ID: 11652865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Undefined experimental treatment exclusions in health insurance contracts: a proposal for judicial response.
    Belk J
    Wash Law Rev; 1991 Jul; 66(3):809-30. PubMed ID: 11652624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medical necessity, AIDS, and the law.
    Schultz GP; Pormenter CA
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1990; 9(2):379-420. PubMed ID: 11651112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Emerging technologies and medical coverage.
    Merrikin K; Smith S
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1996; 10(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 11660222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental drugs: more of them, but they're no longer free.
    Caplan J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):3. PubMed ID: 11644019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Health care providers, insurers, and individual patients; the right to treatment; economic and policy issues.
    Stoddard JC; Billings PR; Astrue MJ; Tennenbaum D; Lynch EC
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1993; 27(4):1499-523. PubMed ID: 11657047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. FDA's new rule on treatment use and sale of investigational new drugs.
    Levine RJ
    IRB; 1987; 9(4):1-4. PubMed ID: 11649946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Getting new drugs to people with AIDS: a public policy response to Lansdale.
    Cohen MN
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1991; 18(3):471-85. PubMed ID: 11651493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. National Conference on Birth, Death, and Law: report.
    Andrews LB; Mariner WK;
    Jurimetrics; 1989; 29(4):403-36. PubMed ID: 11652560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surrogate consent and the incompetent experimental subject.
    Bein PM
    Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1991 Sep; 46(5):739-71. PubMed ID: 11651381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Equitable access to biomedical advances: getting beyond the rights impasse.
    Mariner WK
    Conn Law Rev; 1989; 21(3):571-603. PubMed ID: 11650430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In business to treat cancer.
    Henig RM
    N Y Times Mag; 1986 Nov; ():68, 70, 78, 80+. PubMed ID: 11647805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Secrets of the artificial heart business.
    Anderson I
    New Sci; 1984 Dec; 104(1433):7. PubMed ID: 11655657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Considering experimentation and elusive truth: informed consent made difficult.
    Brodeur D
    Issues (St Louis Mo); 1992; 7(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 11659444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The heart transplant dilemma.
    Evans RW
    Issues Sci Technol; 1986; 2(3):91-101. PubMed ID: 11658799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shaking up the status quo: how AIDS activists have challenged drug development and approval procedures.
    Dunbar MM
    Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1991 Sep; 46(5):673-706. PubMed ID: 11651380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Liver transplantation in Massachusetts: public policymaking as morality play.
    Havighurst CC; King NM
    Indiana Law Rev; 1986; 19(4):955-87. PubMed ID: 11650768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. If a subject incurs obligations and carries them out, then consent is a contract: Dahl v. HEM Pharmaceuticals (Part II).
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1996 Jan; 11(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 11653221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.