These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652364)

  • 21. Scott v. Plante.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    Fed Report; 1982 Oct; 691():634-9. PubMed ID: 11648511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy.
    Brooks AD
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Forced drug medication of involuntarily committed mental patients.
    Blais NR
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1975; 20(1):100-19. PubMed ID: 11664646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pennhurst, Romeo, and Rogers. The Burger Court and Mental Health Law Reform Litigation.
    Brant J
    J Leg Med; 1983 Sep; 4(3):323-48. PubMed ID: 6605401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Two Supreme Court rulings provide mentally ill defendants new protections.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Therapeutic jurisprudence and the civil rights of institutionalized mentally disabled persons: hopeless oxymoron or path to redemption?
    Perlin ML; Gould KK; Dorfman DA
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 1995 Mar; 1(1):80-119. PubMed ID: 12803207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. o'Connor v. Donaldson: due process rights of mental patients in state hospitals.
    Anderson K
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1976; 6(1):65-82. PubMed ID: 11664777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Supreme Court rules against involuntary custodial confinement of the nondangerous mentally ill.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1975 Sep; 26(9):616+. PubMed ID: 11643281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Constitutional requirements in the commitment of the mentally ill in the U.S.A.: rights to liberty and therapy.
    Flaschner FN
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 1974; 18(3):283-301. PubMed ID: 11664409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Civil commitment of mentally ill--right to treatment--parens patriae power--right to liberty.
    Cooper GG
    Akron Law Rev; 1975; 9(2):374-82. PubMed ID: 11664558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. O'Connor v. Donaldson: constitutional law--mental health--a state cannot constitutionally confine without more, a nondangerous individual adjudged to be mentally ill.
    Fields JD
    Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(2):511-30. PubMed ID: 11664626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Philipp v. Carey.
    U.S. District Court, N.D. New York
    Fed Suppl; 1981 Jun; 517():513-21. PubMed ID: 11648517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. O'Connor v. Donaldson: the Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment.
    Winthrop LF
    Calif West Law Rev; 1976; 13(1):168-87. PubMed ID: 11664747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst.
    Ferleger D; Scott PM
    West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):327-61. PubMed ID: 11658602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. o'Connor v. Donaldson: a right to liberty for the nondangerous mentally ill.
    Muller MJ
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1975; 3(2):550-62. PubMed ID: 11664550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
    Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. o'Connor v. Donaldson: the death of the quid pro quo argument for a right to treatment?
    Bliss TP
    Clevel State Law Rev; 1975; 24(3):557-71. PubMed ID: 11661275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Due process--involuntary civil confinement: a right to rehabilitative treatment?
    Vermillion LJ
    ISL Law Rev; 1976; 1(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 11664678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Involuntary commitment: the move toward dangerousness.
    Weissbourd R
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1982; 15(1):83-113. PubMed ID: 11658335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The "right to treatment": can the courts rehabilitate and cure?
    Miller HL
    Public Interest; 1977; (46):. PubMed ID: 11664773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.