These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652364)

  • 41. The past and present of the right to treatment: a slogan gone astray.
    Slovenko R
    J Psychiatry Law; 1981; 9(3):263-82. PubMed ID: 11658289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Donaldson v. O'Connor: constitutional right to treatment for the involuntary civilly committed.
    Jernigan LT
    North Carol Centr Law J; 1975; 7(1):174-86. PubMed ID: 11664561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Open Sesame: the Constitution and mental institutions.
    Trotter RJ
    Sci News; 1975 Jul; 108(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 11664469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment.
    Grant GM
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Constitutional law--right to liberty--involuntary confinement of mental patients.
    Tenn Law Rev; 1976; 43(2):366-73. PubMed ID: 11664691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Mental health law--42 U.S.C. Section 6010 held not to create substantive rights in favor of mentally retarded: Pennhurst State School v. Halderman, 101 S.Ct. 1531 (1981).
    Calvey FL
    Marquette Law Rev; 1981; 65(1):156-66. PubMed ID: 11658449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future.
    Wallach S
    Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill.
    Stromberg CD; Stone AA
    Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Mental health and developmental disabilities code.
    Illinois
    Smith-Hurd Ill Annot Statut Ill; 1983-1984; ChaPter 91.1.2 Sections 1.100 to 6.107(Suppl):. PubMed ID: 12043648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Decisions by and for people with mental retardation: balancing considerations of autonomy and protection.
    Ellis JW
    Villanova Law Rev; 1992; 37(6):1779-809. PubMed ID: 11654415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Constitutional law--simple custodial confinement of civilly committed nondangerous mentally ill violates constitutional right to freedom.
    Concemi M
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):76-99. PubMed ID: 11664545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The significance for psychology of O'Connor v. Donaldson: a reply to Bernard.
    Siegel RA
    Am Psychol; 1978 Sep; 33(9):858-61. PubMed ID: 11643479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. New York court says mentally ill have right to refuse medication.
    Gross J
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():A1, B10. PubMed ID: 11646485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Abandoned but not forgotten: the illegal confinement of elderly people in state psychiatric institutions.
    Kanter AS
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19():273-307. PubMed ID: 11659687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Right to treatment for the civilly committed: a new Eighth Amendment basis.
    Roberts TD
    Univ Chic Law Rev; 1978; 45(3):731-52. PubMed ID: 11664970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.
    Roth LH
    Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A comparison of a mentally ill individual's right to refuse medication under the United States and the New York State constitutions.
    Brooks WM
    Touro Law Rev; 1991; 8(1):1-54. PubMed ID: 11659527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1981 Apr; 451():1-55. PubMed ID: 12041272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Reevaluating substantive due process as a source of protection for psychiatric patients to refuse drugs.
    Brooks WM
    Indiana Law Rev; 1998; 31(4):937-1017. PubMed ID: 15386905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Mental health--the right to refuse drug therapy under "emergency restraint statutes".
    McGovern JJ
    New Engl Law Rev; 1976; 11(2):509-40. PubMed ID: 11664602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.