These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652373)

  • 21. Wrongful life--a tort whose time has come.
    Bradley M
    Am J Trial Advocacy; 1978; 2(1):107-33. PubMed ID: 11664976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The ascription of rights in wrongful life suits.
    Jecker NS
    Law Philos; 1987 Aug; 6(2):149-65. PubMed ID: 11658982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The case of the unwanted blessing: wrongful life.
    Kashi JS
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1977 Nov; 31(5):1409-32. PubMed ID: 11664865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Wrongful birth and wrongful life: questions of public policy.
    Donovan JL
    Loyola Law Rev; 1982; 28(1):77-99. PubMed ID: 11658438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dumer v. St. Michael's Hospital. 30 Sep 1975.
    Wisconsin. Supreme Court
    Wests North West Rep; 1975; 233():372-80. PubMed ID: 12038327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Wrongful life and the counterfactual element in harming.
    Feinberg J
    Soc Philos Policy; 1986; 4(1):145-78. PubMed ID: 11658783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A preference for nonexistence: wrongful life and a proposed tort of genetic malpractice.
    Sonnenburg MA
    South Calif Law Rev; 1982 Jan; 55(2):477-510. PubMed ID: 11658620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Protecting the unconceived: nonexistence, avoidability, and reproductive technology.
    Peters PG
    Ariz Law Rev; 1989; 31(3):487-548. PubMed ID: 11659319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The duty to prevent handicaps: laws promoting the prevention of handicaps to newborns.
    Parness JA
    West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):431-64. PubMed ID: 11658603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Wrongful birth in the abortion context--critique of existing case law and proposal for future actions.
    Morris KL
    Denver Law J; 1976; 53(3):501-20. PubMed ID: 11663712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fetal rights? It depends.
    Doudera AE
    Trial; 1982 Apr; 18(4):38-44, 74-76. PubMed ID: 11649512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Wrongful birth--the problem of damage computation.
    Moore MM
    UMKC Law Rev; 1979; 48(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11665189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The moral status of wrongful life claims.
    Dimopoulos P; Bagaric M
    Common Law World Rev; 2003; 32(1):35-64. PubMed ID: 15973802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Three state appellate courts would deny claims for "wrongful life" but would award some kind of damages to parents for "wrongful birth" of disabled child.
    Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1979; 3(5):314-7. PubMed ID: 11665055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hummel v. Reiss: the New Jersey Supreme Court takes a step backward in its recognition of wrongful life.
    Barrett TA
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1993; 46(1):535-63. PubMed ID: 11652806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Washington recognizes wrongful birth and wrongful life: a critical analysis--Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc., 98 Wn.2d 460, 656 P.2d 483 (l983).
    VanDerhoef PJ
    Wash Law Rev; 1983 Jul; 58(3):649-78. PubMed ID: 11658507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Maternal substance abuse: the need to provide legal protection for the fetus.
    Balisy SS
    South Calif Law Rev; 1987 May; 60(4):1209-38. PubMed ID: 11658941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The fragile X omen: scientific advances compel a legislative treatment of wrongful life and wrongful birth.
    Hackett K
    J Law Technol; 1987; 2(2):249-72. PubMed ID: 11659197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Right to sue in abortion is upheld.
    Uhlig MA
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Jun; ():B1. PubMed ID: 11647830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Becker v. Schwartz. 27 Dec 1978.
    New York. Court of Appeals
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1978; 386():807-19. PubMed ID: 12038344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.