247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652405)
1. The constitutionality of mandatory genetic screening statutes.
Adelman CS
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1981; 31(4):897-948. PubMed ID: 11652405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethical aspects of genetic testing.
Fruchtman CE; Pizzulli FC
Whittier Law Rev; 1998; 20(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 11660804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic fallout: new technologies are changing the legal landscape.
Andrews LB
Trial; 1995 Dec; 31(12):20-23, 25-27. PubMed ID: 11660434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetic screening and counseling: the legal and ethical issues.
Waltz JR; Thigpen CR
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1973; 68(4):696-768. PubMed ID: 11662927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Newborn screening for sickle cell disease and other hemoglobinopathies: overview of legal issues.
Andrews LB
Pediatrics; 1989 May; 83(5 part 2):886-90. PubMed ID: 11651962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Damage control for victims of physical assault: testing the innocent for AIDS.
Bruyere MP
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1994; 21(3):945-79. PubMed ID: 11660259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Birthright or life sentence: controlling the threat of genetic testing.
Nobles K
South Calif Law Rev; 1992; 65(4):2081-128. PubMed ID: 11659655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The confidentiality of HIV-related information: responding to the resurgence of aggressive public health interventions in the AIDS epidemic.
Doughty R
Calif Law Rev; 1994 Jan; 82(1):111-84. PubMed ID: 11652741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. HIV-specific crime legislation: targeting an epidemic for criminal prosecution.
O'Toole EM
J Law Health; 1995-1996; 10(1):183-208. PubMed ID: 11655191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. "Fitness" for birth and reproduction: legal implications of genetic screening.
Annas GJ; Coyne B
Fam Law Q; 1975; 9(3):463-89. PubMed ID: 11664499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection.
Smith SR
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. When rape victims' rights meet privacy rights: mandatory HIV testing, striking the fourth amendment balance.
Sadler BP
Wash Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 67(1):195-213. PubMed ID: 11652670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mandatory HIV testing issues in state newborn screening programs.
Naber JM; Johnson DR
J Law Health; 1992-1993; 7(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 11659620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Out for blood: mandatory AIDS testing.
Anderson DR
Pediatr AIDS HIV Infect; 1995 Aug; 6(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 11657552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. HIV and dentistry.
Lawyer MH
Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1994; 29(1):297-359. PubMed ID: 11660043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Mandatory premarital HIV testing: political exploitation of the AIDS epidemic.
Closen M; Gamrath R; Hopkins D
Tulane Law Rev; 1994 Nov; 69(1):71-115. PubMed ID: 11653344
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Mandatory testing of public employees for the human immunodeficiency virus: the Fourth Amendment and medical reasonableness.
Curran CD
Columbia Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 90(3):720-59. PubMed ID: 11652561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Remedies for improper disclosure of genetic data.
Riskin LL; Reilly P
Rutgers Camden Law J; 1977; 8(3):480-506. PubMed ID: 11663039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The constitutional implications of mandatory testing for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome--AIDS.
Levy SJ
Emory Law J; 1988; 37(1):217-48. PubMed ID: 11652522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Genetic information and third party access to information: New Jersey's pioneering legislation as a model for federal privacy protection of genetic information.
Stepanuk NA
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1998; 47(3):1105-44. PubMed ID: 11660610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
