These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652440)
1. Paternal child-support tort parallel for the abortion on maternal demand era: the work of Regan, Levy, and Duncan. Swan GS Glendale Law Rev; 1981-1982; 5(2):151-87. PubMed ID: 11652440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The father's rights in the abortion decision. Schultz WL Tex Tech Law Rev; 1975; 6(3):1075-94. PubMed ID: 11664508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements--right to privacy. Long SL; Ravenscraft P Akron Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):367-82. PubMed ID: 11664733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Paternal interests in the abortion decision: does the father have a say? Diggins M Univ Chic Leg Forum; 1989; 1989():377-97. PubMed ID: 11656041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion: the father's rights. Gilbert RA Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1973; 42(3):441-67. PubMed ID: 11664234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sex as contract: abortion and expanded choice. Feaver PD; Kling R; Plofchan TK Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1992-1993 Winter; 4():211-20. PubMed ID: 11652652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of the abortion decisions upon the father's role. Witherspoon JP Jurist; 1975; 35(1):32-65. PubMed ID: 11664577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The family at bay. DeMarco D Hum Life Rev; 1982; 8(4):44-54. PubMed ID: 11651705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Constitutional law--abortion--court focuses on husband's interest regarding spousal notification requirement to procure abortion: Scheinberg v. Smith, 659 F.2d 746 (5th Cir. 1981). Adams C Cumberland Law Rev; 1982-1983; 13(1):143-59. PubMed ID: 11658434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The husband's rights in abortion. Etzioni A Trial; 1976 Nov; 12(11):56-8. PubMed ID: 11664680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The theory of the Danforth case. Canavan F Hum Life Rev; 1976; 2(4):5-14. PubMed ID: 11662291 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The consent question--parental and spousal consent for abortions. Davis CD Tex Hosp; 1976 Sep; 32(9):27-30. PubMed ID: 11664739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Parental involvement in adolescent abortion decisions: a legal and psychological critique. Embree MG; Dobson TA Law Inequal; 1991 Dec; 10(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 11659634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Killing "the handicapped" -- before and after birth. Field MA Harv Womens Law J; 1993; 16():79-138. PubMed ID: 11652872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Due process and equal protection: constitutional implications of abortion notice and reporting requirements. Rickless DM Boston Univ Law Rev; 1976 May; 56(3):522-41. PubMed ID: 11664624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations. Witherspoon JP St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion, parental burdens, and the right to choose: is a penumbral or Ninth-Amendment right about to arise from the ashes of a common law liberty? Swan GS Case Comment; 1977; 82(3):30-2. PubMed ID: 11664856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. S.J. Res. 110: Human Life Federalism Amendment. Hatch OG Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Sep; 127(131):S10194-8. PubMed ID: 11658572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around. Horan DJ; Marzen TJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Sui generis: the legal nature of the foetus in Canada. McConnell ML Can Bar Rev; 1991; 70():548-56. PubMed ID: 11656180 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]