207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652469)
21. The right of the mentally ill to receive treatment in the community.
Rapson R
Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1980; 16(2):193-268. PubMed ID: 11665276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Judicial decisions in civil commitment: facts, attitudes, and psychiatric recommendations.
Hiday VA
Law Soc Rev; 1983; 17(3):517-30. PubMed ID: 11658694
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The rights of mental health detainees.
Robinson DA; Motz BM
Los Angel Lawyer; 1982; 5(5):10-5. PubMed ID: 11653529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Constitutional law: standard of proof in involuntary civil commitments.
Whiteman DL
Washburn Law J; 1980; 19(2):350-8. PubMed ID: 11658363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Paternalism, civil commitment and illness politics: assessing the current debate and outlining a future direction.
Arrigo BA
J Law Health; 1992-1993; 7(2):131-68. PubMed ID: 11652819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Least restrictive treatment of involuntary patients: translating concepts into practice.
Keilitz I; Conn D; Giampetro A
St Louis Univ Law J; 1985; 29(3):691-745. PubMed ID: 11649207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
Belzer I
UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Psychiatric hospitalization and the Constitution: some observation on emerging trends.
Reisner R
Univ Ill Law Forum; 1973; 1973(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 11664295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Mental health law reform in Massachusetts.
Walker OS
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1973 Nov; 53(5):986-1017. PubMed ID: 11664297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The 1983 revision of the Texas mental health code.
Dix GE
St Marys Law J; 1984; 16(1):41-153. PubMed ID: 11658786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Voluntary admission of mentally impaired minors: constitutional considerations.
Turnbull HR
Pop Gov; 1976; 41(4):22-5. PubMed ID: 11658625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Conservatorship of Roulet: civil commitment and due process in California.
Klipstein DB; Weinroth DJ
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1979; 6(4):1061-106. PubMed ID: 11658279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Civil commitment of the mentally ill: Lessard v. Schmidt.
Landis AH
De Paul Law Rev; 1974; 23(3):1276-97. PubMed ID: 11664582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Montana's mental health commitment code: a decade old.
Sokkappa PM
Mont Law Rev; 1985; 46(2):245-60. PubMed ID: 11658719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Legal problems involved in implementing the right to treatment.
Morris GH
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1973 Jan; 1(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 11664496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.
Roth LH
Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The Minnesota Commitment Act of 1982: summary and analysis.
Janus ES; Wolfson RM
Hamline Law Rev; 1983 Feb; 6(1):41-94. PubMed ID: 11658497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. State voluntary civil commitment statutes.
Beis E
Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1983; 7(5):430-5. PubMed ID: 11658686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. States move to ease law committing mentally ill.
Goleman D
N Y Times Web; 1986 Dec; ():C1, C4. PubMed ID: 11647825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Procedural safeguards for the involuntary commitment of the mentally ill in the District of Columbia.
Bohman JL
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1979; 28(4):855-86. PubMed ID: 11665194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
