These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan. Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The evanescence of living wills. Francis LP Real Property Probate Trust J; 1989; 24(1):141-64. PubMed ID: 11652557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Nutritional discontinuation: active or passive euthanasia? Banja JD J Neurosurg Nurs; 1990 Apr; 22(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 11659424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Right to die takes a twist. Med World News; 1985 Mar; 26(5):7. PubMed ID: 11645546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill. Eisenberg KG Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The slippery slope. Doyle K; Carroll A New Law J; 1996 May; 146(6745):759-61. PubMed ID: 11657174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Death with dignity: implementing one's right to die. Zaremba JF Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(3):557-77. PubMed ID: 11651900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Right to die: a survey of legislative and judicial responses to life-support technology. Richardson E Glendale Law Rev; 1981-1982; 5(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 11652441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The "small beginnings" of euthanasia: examining the erosion in legal prohibitions against mercy-killing. Koop CE; Grant ER Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):585-634. PubMed ID: 11650885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Criminal law--homicide--removal of intravenous feeding line from vegetative, comatose patient at family's request is not murder. Barber v. Superior Court, 147 Cal. App. 3d 1006, 195 Cal. Rptr. 484 (1983). Crook RR Cumberland Law Rev; 1984-1985; 15(1):225-37. PubMed ID: 11652439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. 'Right-to-die' theory upheld in New Jersey. Rust M Am Med News; 1985 Feb; 28(5):1, 23. PubMed ID: 11653617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law. Tarantino LM Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In re Conroy: forging a path to death with dignity. Agrawal A Boston Univ Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 67(2):365-89. PubMed ID: 11649960 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In re Estate of Longeway. Illinois. Supreme Court North East Rep Second Ser; 1989 Nov; 549():292-322. PubMed ID: 12041217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of the family in medical decisionmaking for incompetent adult patients: a historical perspective and case analysis. Krasik EB Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1987; 48(2):539-618. PubMed ID: 11658944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In re Quinlan: one step further. Ek GK Houst Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 24(2):383-98. PubMed ID: 11649893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Withholding food and water from a patient--should it be condoned in California? Harber SM Pac Law J; 1985 Apr; 16(3):877-93. PubMed ID: 11652432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents. Buchanan AE UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]