These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652494)
1. The impact of IRBs on political science research. Cleary RE IRB; 1987; 9(3):6-10. PubMed ID: 11652494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Federal regulation of social research. Is "prior review" posing a threat to academic freedom? Seiler LH; Murtha JM Freedom Issue; 1979; (53):. PubMed ID: 11663338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Government regulation of research. Seiler LH; Murtha JM Society; 1980; 18(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 11661970 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Revising human subjects policy: an example of consensual decision-making. Cohen JM; Hedberg WB J Soc Res Adm; 1984; 15(4):29-34. PubMed ID: 11649707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Institutional review boards and research on individuals with mental disorders. Hoppe SK Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):187-95. PubMed ID: 11654514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. All is not well in research on human subjects. Goldman J N Y Times Web; 1986 Mar; ():A26. PubMed ID: 11647822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Human experimentation: the review process in practice. Cowan DH Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Human subject research review in the Department of Defense. Winter PE IRB; 1984; 6(3):9-10. PubMed ID: 11649568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Governmental regulation of the investigation of human subjects in social research. Pattullo EL Minerva; 1985; 23(4):521-33. PubMed ID: 11645795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Changing federal regulation of IRBs, Part III: social research and the proposed DHEW regulations. Gray BH IRB; 1980 Jan; 2(1):1-5+. PubMed ID: 11661793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. U.S. halts research on humans at Duke: university can't ensure safety, probers find. Weiss R Washington Post; 1999 May; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11647726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Continuing review of research involving human subjects: approach to the problem and remaining areas of concern. Gordon B; Prentice E IRB; 1997; 19(2):8-11. PubMed ID: 11655323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Censoring research. De Sola Pool I Society; 1980; 18(1):39-40. PubMed ID: 11661972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Inconsistency, idiosyncrasy, and IRBs. Caplan AL IRB; 1984; 6(2):10-2. PubMed ID: 11649537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Beyond localism: a proposal for a National Research Review Board. Levine C; Caplan AL IRB; 1986; 8(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11649751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bill of rights for research subjects. Prentice ED; Reitemeier PJ; Antonson DL; Kelso TK; Jameton A IRB; 1993; 15(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11651568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Professional protectionism rides again: a commentary on exempted research and responses to DHEW's proposed regulations. Swazey JP IRB; 1980 Mar; 2(3):4-6. PubMed ID: 11661839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The history of institutional review boards. Sherman M; Van Vleet JD Regul Aff J; 1991; 3():615-27. PubMed ID: 11651491 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]