293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652503)
1. Artificial nutrition and the terminally ill: how should Washington decide?
Beatty JA
Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):419-57. PubMed ID: 11652503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill.
Eisenberg KG
Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Death and life decisions: who is in control?
Kenney SC
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 23(3):791-828. PubMed ID: 11652584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of the Cruzan case on the rights of elderly clients.
Gottlich V
Clgh Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 11652574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act: too little, too late?
Chapman MA
Ark Law Rev; 1989; 42(2):319-94. PubMed ID: 11653880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Family surrogate laws: a necessary supplement to living wills and durable powers of attorney.
Hamann AA
Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(1):103-77. PubMed ID: 11654083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach.
Marzen TJ
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):293-317. PubMed ID: 11651815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The recent amendments to the Texas Natural Death Act: implications for health care providers.
Greenfield RE
St Marys Law J; 1986; 17(3):1003-51. PubMed ID: 11652489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The encouragment of empathy: just decisionmaking for incompetent terminal patients.
Oxman ML
J Law Health; 1988-1989; 3(2):189-217. PubMed ID: 11652566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Constitutionalizing the "right to die".
Mayo TW
MD Law Rev; 1990; 49(1):103-55. PubMed ID: 11656023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Therefore, choose death.
Brown ML
Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Right to die: a survey of legislative and judicial responses to life-support technology.
Richardson E
Glendale Law Rev; 1981-1982; 5(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 11652441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act.
New Jersey
N J Statut Annot N J; 1991 Jul; Chapt. 201 Sects. 26.2H.53 to 26.2H.78():26:2H-53 to 26:2H-78. PubMed ID: 12043617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Introduction: the right to die after Cruzan.
Hoffmann DE
Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11651214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. "Living will" legislation in Illinois: what it could mean to doctor and patient.
King PD
Ill Bar J; 1984 Apr; 72(8):408-410, 412-413. PubMed ID: 11649772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The "terminal condition" condition in Virginia's Natural Death Act.
Matthew DB
Va Law Rev; 1987 May; 73(4):749-81. PubMed ID: 11652506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. AIDS and living wills.
Kortlandt CE
AIDS Public Policy J; 1990; 5(4):157-66. PubMed ID: 11650975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Death with dignity in Mississippi? An analysis of Mississippi's Natural Death Act.
Vitiello M
Miss Law J; 1984; 54(3&4):459-507. PubMed ID: 11652509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri.
Johnson SH
St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In re Drabick.
Di Somma AV
Issues Law Med; 1989; 4(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 11644377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
