293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652503)
41. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference.
Richard SM
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. The Cruzan decision -- a surgeon's perspective.
McNoble DJ
Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1990; 20(4):569-610. PubMed ID: 11652628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Helping the hopelessly ill.
Landsman RM
Trusts Estates; 1988 Apr; 127(4):37-42. PubMed ID: 11652539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Delio v. Westchester County Medical Center.
Kirkpatrick GA
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 11644323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Justices find a right to die, but the majority sees need for clear proof of intent.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1990 Jun; ():A1, A18, A19. PubMed ID: 11646758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The Virginia Natural Death Act--a critical analysis.
Murphy JG
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1983; 17(4):863-79. PubMed ID: 11649800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. In re Bayer.
Kirkpatrick GA
Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 11644092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
Strasser M
KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law.
Tarantino LM
Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications.
Parry JW
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. In re Storar: euthanasia for incompetent patients, a proposed model.
Haber JG
Pace Law Rev; 1983; 3(2):351-74. PubMed ID: 11658505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. State natural death acts: illusory protection of individuals' life-sustaining treatment decisions.
Lerner MJ
Harvard J Legis; 1992; 29(1):175-221. PubMed ID: 11652635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Senate Bill 1, Ohio's advance directives law: where have we been...where are we going?
Hillman JM
J Law Health; 1992-1993; 7(2):295-320. PubMed ID: 11652821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Living will statutes: the first decade.
Gelfand G
Wis L Rev; 1987; 5(5):737-822. PubMed ID: 11650367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Coming to terms with death: the Cruzan case.
Martyn SR; Bourguignon HJ
Hastings Law J; 1991 Mar; 42(3):817-58. PubMed ID: 11652588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The Catholic tradition on the use of nutrition and fluids.
Paris JJ; McCormick RA
America (NY); 1987 May; 156(17):356-61. PubMed ID: 11658928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. The evanescence of living wills.
Francis LP
Real Property Probate Trust J; 1989; 24(1):141-64. PubMed ID: 11652557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Informed consent, termination of medical treatment, and the Federal Tort Claims Act: a new proposal for the military health care system.
Deardorff SE
Mil Law Rev; 1987 Jan; 115():1-120. PubMed ID: 11658904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Death and dying in Tennessee.
McKenney EJ
Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1977; 7(4):503-54. PubMed ID: 11663172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests.
Watson DE
Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1147-81. PubMed ID: 11651439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
