These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652508)
1. A critique of Louisiana's approach to withholding medical treatment from defective newborns. Goichman G South Univ Law Rev; 1983; 9(2):157-84. PubMed ID: 11652508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection. Smith SR Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention. Riga PJ Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma? Shapiro RS; Barthel R Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Born to live or born to die: the handicapped newborn in New Jersey. Sarno JJ Seton Hall Legis J; 1987; 11(1):201-22. PubMed ID: 11651899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn. Horan DJ; Balch BJ Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical treatment of defective newborns: an answer to the "Baby Doe" dilemma. Shapiro RS Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(1):137-52. PubMed ID: 11651781 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The treatment of handicapped newborns: is there a role for law? Burt RA Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):279-91. PubMed ID: 11651814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The legislative response to Infant Doe. Kuzma AL Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. On letting seriously ill minors die: a review of Louisiana's Natural Death Act. Vitiello M Loyola Law Rev; 1985; 31(1):67-91. PubMed ID: 11651863 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. MDs, lawyers probe ethical, legal issues in ending treatment. Bolsen B Am Med News; 1984 Apr; 27(13):11-3. PubMed ID: 11653535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical ethics in life and death. Thompson R Editor Res Rep; 1984 Feb; 1(8):147-68. PubMed ID: 11652477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Baby Jane Doe ruling upheld; suit fails. Curran M Ob Gyn News; 1983 Dec 15-31; 18(24):8. PubMed ID: 11653509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Forgoing treatment of critically ill newborns and the legal legacy of Baby Doe. Nelson LJ Clin Ethics Rep; 1992; 6(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Premature infants: a legal approach to decision-making in neonatal intensive care. Gorski SL Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1985; 19(3-4):261-81. PubMed ID: 11649774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Severely disabled newborns: to live or let die? Jackson CC J Leg Med; 1987 Mar; 8(1):135-76. PubMed ID: 11644153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Model Procedures for Child Protective Service Agencies Responding to Reports of Withholding Medically Indicated Treatment from Disabled Infants with Life-Threatening Conditions. Nicholson EB; Horowitz RM; Parry J; ; Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1986; 10(3):221-49. PubMed ID: 11651933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The legacy of Infant Doe. Cosby MG Bayl Law Rev; 1982; 34(4):699-715. PubMed ID: 11651747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]