These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
760 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652556)
21. Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests. Watson DE Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1147-81. PubMed ID: 11651439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Death and life decisions: who is in control? Kenney SC Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 23(3):791-828. PubMed ID: 11652584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri. Johnson SH St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Two-step fantastic: the continuing case of Brother Fox. Ramsey P Theol Stud; 1981 Mar; 42(1):122-34. PubMed ID: 11658893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Foregoing life-sustaining treatment: what are the legal limits in an aging society? Rothenberg KH St Louis Univ Law J; 1989; 33(3):575-602. PubMed ID: 11650402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Whose right is it anyway? Individualism, community, and the right to die: a commentary on the New Jersey experience. Weinberg JK Hastings Law J; 1988 Nov; 40(1):119-67. PubMed ID: 11659106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. A proposed amendment to the California Natural Death Act to assure the statutory right to control life sustaining treatment decisions. Clementino BJ Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1983; 17(2):579-609. PubMed ID: 11649789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Therefore choose death? Appelbaum PS; Klein JI Commentary; 1986 Apr; 81(4):23-9. PubMed ID: 11658682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The values history: a new standard of care. Rich BA Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1109-81. PubMed ID: 11652633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Active euthanasia: can it be justified? Molenda FA Euthan Rev; 1988; 3(1):15-43. PubMed ID: 11649265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Where death begins while life continues. King DD; Roberts CE; Jefferson LS; Brody BA South Tex Law Rev; 1990 Feb; 31(1):145-90. PubMed ID: 11651056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The right to death. Dworkin R New York Rev Books; 1991 Jan; ():14-7. PubMed ID: 11653244 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents. Buchanan AE UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The right of elderly patients to refuse life-sustaining treatment. Annas GJ; Glantz LH Milbank Q; 1986; 64(Suppl. 2):95-162. PubMed ID: 11649886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comprehensive look at Connecticut's living will statute. Lieberson A Conn Probate Law J; 1992; 7(1):49-113. PubMed ID: 11653117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Decision-making in terminal care: the days of one's life and the life of one's days. Dickens BM Sask Law Rev; 1986-1987; 51(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11652507 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Missing persons: legal perceptions of incompetent patients. Dresser R Rutgers Law Rev; 1994; 46(2):609-719. PubMed ID: 11660406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Cruzan v. Harmon and the dangerous claim that others can exercise an incapacitated patient's right to die. Ellman IM Jurimetrics; 1989; 29(4):389-401. PubMed ID: 11652559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Suicidal competence and the patient's right to refuse lifesaving treatment. Matthews MA Calif Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 75(2):707-58. PubMed ID: 11652518 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The living will: the epitome of human dignity in coping with the historical event of death. Kutner L Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(4):661-86. PubMed ID: 11652520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]