These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

760 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652556)

  • 41. Cruzan and the constitutional status of nontreatment decisions for incompetent patients.
    Robertson JA
    Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1139-202. PubMed ID: 11652580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Life, death, and incompetent patients: conceptual infirmities and hidden values in the law.
    Dresser R
    Ariz Law Rev; 1986; 28(3):373-405. PubMed ID: 11652552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Perspectives on Cruzan: the sirens' lure of invented consent -- a critique of autonomy-based surrogate decisionmaking for legally-incapacitated older persons.
    Bopp J; Avila D
    Hastings Law J; 1991 Mar; 42(3):779-815. PubMed ID: 11652587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Balancing the right to die with competing interests: a socio-legal enigma.
    Peterson GW
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 1985; 13(1):109-55. PubMed ID: 11658936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The real ethic of death and dying.
    Cantor NL
    Mich Law Rev; 1996 May; 94(6):1718-38. PubMed ID: 11656929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
    Strasser M
    KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. USCC brief in Nancy Cruzan case: continued nutrition and hydration urged.
    United States Catholic Conference
    Origins; 1989 Oct; 19(21):345-51. PubMed ID: 11652554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Medico-legal aspects of the 'right to die' legislation in Australia.
    Mendelson D
    Melb Univ Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 19(1):112-52. PubMed ID: 11654112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Therefore, choose death.
    Brown ML
    Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision.
    Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R
    KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The encouragment of empathy: just decisionmaking for incompetent terminal patients.
    Oxman ML
    J Law Health; 1988-1989; 3(2):189-217. PubMed ID: 11652566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. People with pipes: a question of euthanasia.
    Machler S
    Univ Puget Sound Law Rev; 1993; 16(2):781-832. PubMed ID: 11659755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Life-support withdrawal: law of commiseration or principle?
    Byrnes JC
    Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):331-54. PubMed ID: 11651213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Is there a right to die?
    Grad FP
    Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1976; 12(4):489-529. PubMed ID: 11663026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Life and death decisions in the nursery: standards and procedures for withholding lifesaving treatment from infants.
    Smith SR
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1125-86. PubMed ID: 11651775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Maine's living will act and the termination of life-sustaining medical procedures.
    Herlan ER
    Maine Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):83-148. PubMed ID: 11652533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Artificial nutrition and the terminally ill: how should Washington decide?
    Beatty JA
    Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):419-57. PubMed ID: 11652503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The roles of the family in making health care decisions for incompetent patients.
    Francis LP
    Utah Law Rev; 1992; 1992(3):861-90. PubMed ID: 11656535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Informed consent, termination of medical treatment, and the Federal Tort Claims Act: a new proposal for the military health care system.
    Deardorff SE
    Mil Law Rev; 1987 Jan; 115():1-120. PubMed ID: 11658904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The right of the elderly to self-determination and New York's legislative imperative.
    Tomlinson AK
    Pace Law Rev; 1988; 8(1):63-113. PubMed ID: 11650172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.