967 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652581)
1. When is there a constitutional "right to die"? When is there no constitutional "right to live".
Kamisar Y
Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1203-42. PubMed ID: 11652581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Letting patients die: legal and moral reflections.
Kadish SH
Calif Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 80(4):857-88. PubMed ID: 11652646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law.
Allsopp ME
Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cruzan and the constitutional status of nontreatment decisions for incompetent patients.
Robertson JA
Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1139-202. PubMed ID: 11652580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing quality of life: a response to Professor Kamisar.
Robertson JA
Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1243-52. PubMed ID: 11652582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The right to death.
Dworkin R
New York Rev Books; 1991 Jan; ():14-7. PubMed ID: 11653244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Surrogate consent.
Richards N
Public Aff Q; 1992 Apr; 6(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 11652630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A line less reasonable: Cruzan and the looming debate over active euthanasia.
Grant ER; Cleaver CA
Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):99-256. PubMed ID: 11651215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests.
Watson DE
Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1147-81. PubMed ID: 11651439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination.
Gilbert LJ
J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. When should the state step aside? Terminating treatment for PVS victims.
Harvey JC; Quinn KP; Johnson SH
Commonweal; 1990 May; 117(9):286-94. PubMed ID: 11652558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Active euthanasia: can it be justified?
Molenda FA
Euthan Rev; 1988; 3(1):15-43. PubMed ID: 11649265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The "value of human life" and "the right to death": some reflections on Cruzan and Ronald Dworkin.
Finnis J
South Ill Univ Law J; 1993; 17():559-71. PubMed ID: 11656302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Justices find a right to die, but the majority sees need for clear proof of intent.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1990 Jun; ():A1, A18, A19. PubMed ID: 11646758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Constitutional development of judicial criteria in right-to-die cases: from brain dead to persistent vegetative state.
Morgan R; Harty-Golder B
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1988; 23(4):721-65. PubMed ID: 11652556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Moral reasoning and legal change: observations on the termination of medical treatment and the development of law.
Jarrett C
Rutgers Law J; 1988; 19(4):999-1028. PubMed ID: 11650183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The right to die: progress and peril.
Capron AM
Euthan Rev; 1987; 2(1 2):41-59. PubMed ID: 11649218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. People with pipes: a question of euthanasia.
Machler S
Univ Puget Sound Law Rev; 1993; 16(2):781-832. PubMed ID: 11659755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Nancy Cruzan case.
McCormick RA
Midwest Med Ethics; 1989; 5(1-2):2-31. PubMed ID: 12091960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The "small beginnings" of euthanasia: examining the erosion in legal prohibitions against mercy-killing.
Koop CE; Grant ER
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):585-634. PubMed ID: 11650885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
