These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652626)

  • 21. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law.
    Tarantino LM
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A ''minor'' decision: right to die or manslaughter?
    Baumrucker SJ; Morris GM; Stolick M; Vandekieft G
    Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2010 Sep; 27(6):428-31. PubMed ID: 20693520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The case for letting vegetative patients die.
    Jennett B
    Ethics Med; 1993; 9(3):40-4. PubMed ID: 11652744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A critique of the five wishes: comments in the light of a papal statement.
    Furton EJ
    Ethics Medics; 2005 Mar; 30(3):3-4. PubMed ID: 15856592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act: too little, too late?
    Chapman MA
    Ark Law Rev; 1989; 42(2):319-94. PubMed ID: 11653880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Advance directives and the persistent vegetative state in Victoria: a human rights perspective.
    Porter D
    J Law Med; 2005 Nov; 13(2):256-70. PubMed ID: 16304765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Paradox and Pandora's box: the tragedy of current right-to-die jurisprudence.
    Roach CA
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 25(1):133-90. PubMed ID: 16145810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Persistent vegetative state: medical, ethical, religious, economic and legal perspectives.
    Oldershaw JB; Atkinson J; Boshes LD
    DePaul J Health Care Law; 1997; 1(3):495-536. PubMed ID: 15282884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Refusing life-sustaining treatment: can we just say no?
    O'Brien EJ
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 67(3):677-706. PubMed ID: 16044604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Should Paul Brophy have been allowed to die?
    Drinan RF
    America (NY); 1986 Nov; 155(15):324-325, 332. PubMed ID: 11658771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ethical problems in living will legislation.
    Hughes R
    J Relig Aging; 1988; 5(1-2):35-50. PubMed ID: 11652837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Egregious inaction: five years later after Of Life and Death.
    Downie J
    Health Law Rev; 2000; 9(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 15706705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Difficult decisions in health care: one woman's journey.
    Walsh MK
    Bioethics Forum; 1997; 13(2):35-7. PubMed ID: 11655288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Cruzan decision -- a surgeon's perspective.
    McNoble DJ
    Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1990; 20(4):569-610. PubMed ID: 11652628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill.
    Eisenberg KG
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Living wills should be treated with caution, ICU director tells conference.
    Johnston C
    CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(9):1370-1. PubMed ID: 11654017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Advance directives: the United States experience.
    Cranford RE
    Humane Med; 1993 Jan; 9(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 11652943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The living will and the will to live.
    Dempsey D
    N Y Times Mag; 1974 P 11-13+; 23 Jun 1974():. PubMed ID: 11663244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Natural death in 2003: are we slipping backwards?
    Ashby M; Mendelson D
    J Law Med; 2003 Feb; 10(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 12649994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The right to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment: national trend and recent changes in Maryland law.
    Goldmeier KE
    MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1306-43. PubMed ID: 12599354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.