These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652627)
1. Judicial innovation and policy re-invention: state supreme courts and the right to die. Glick HR West Polit Q; 1992; ():71-92. PubMed ID: 11652627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of the Cruzan case on the rights of elderly clients. Gottlich V Clgh Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 11652574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill. Eisenberg KG Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In re Quinlan: a synthesis of law and medical technology. Hyland WF; Baime DS Rutgers Camden Law J; 1976; 8(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 11663167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Right to die: a survey of legislative and judicial responses to life-support technology. Richardson E Glendale Law Rev; 1981-1982; 5(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 11652441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act: too little, too late? Chapman MA Ark Law Rev; 1989; 42(2):319-94. PubMed ID: 11653880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The right-to-die: state policymaking and the elderly. Glick HR J Aging Stud; 1991; 5(3):283-307. PubMed ID: 11652602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. AIDS and living wills. Kortlandt CE AIDS Public Policy J; 1990; 5(4):157-66. PubMed ID: 11650975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Living wills: the need for uniform state laws. Warnock HC Probate Prop; 1991; 5(3):52-6. PubMed ID: 11652620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law. Tarantino LM Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The "terminal condition" condition in Virginia's Natural Death Act. Matthew DB Va Law Rev; 1987 May; 73(4):749-81. PubMed ID: 11652506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The right to die: state courts lead where legislatures fear to tread. Hoefler JM; Kamoie BE Law Policy; 1992 Oct; 14(4):337-80. PubMed ID: 11652673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Therefore, choose death. Brown ML Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical treatment rights of older persons and persons with disabilities. National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and Disabled Clgh Rev; 1992 Jan; 25(9):1204-17. PubMed ID: 11659393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Death and dying in Tennessee. McKenney EJ Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1977; 7(4):503-54. PubMed ID: 11663172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Artificial nutrition and the terminally ill: how should Washington decide? Beatty JA Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):419-57. PubMed ID: 11652503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act. New Jersey N J Statut Annot N J; 1991 Jul; Chapt. 201 Sects. 26.2H.53 to 26.2H.78():26:2H-53 to 26:2H-78. PubMed ID: 12043617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Death with dignity in Mississippi? An analysis of Mississippi's Natural Death Act. Vitiello M Miss Law J; 1984; 54(3&4):459-507. PubMed ID: 11652509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Virginia Natural Death Act--a critical analysis. Murphy JG Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1983; 17(4):863-79. PubMed ID: 11649800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Death with dignity laws: a plea for uniform legislation. Freamon BK Seton Hall Legis J; 1982; 5(2):105-47. PubMed ID: 11651748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]