These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
553 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652630)
1. Surrogate consent. Richards N Public Aff Q; 1992 Apr; 6(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 11652630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. When is there a constitutional "right to die"? When is there no constitutional "right to live". Kamisar Y Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1203-42. PubMed ID: 11652581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law. Allsopp ME Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination. Gilbert LJ J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cruzan v. Harmon and the dangerous claim that others can exercise an incapacitated patient's right to die. Ellman IM Jurimetrics; 1989; 29(4):389-401. PubMed ID: 11652559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Letting patients die: legal and moral reflections. Kadish SH Calif Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 80(4):857-88. PubMed ID: 11652646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cruzan and the constitutional status of nontreatment decisions for incompetent patients. Robertson JA Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1139-202. PubMed ID: 11652580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The right to death. Dworkin R New York Rev Books; 1991 Jan; ():14-7. PubMed ID: 11653244 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri. Johnson SH St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. When should the state step aside? Terminating treatment for PVS victims. Harvey JC; Quinn KP; Johnson SH Commonweal; 1990 May; 117(9):286-94. PubMed ID: 11652558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Justices find a right to die, but the majority sees need for clear proof of intent. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1990 Jun; ():A1, A18, A19. PubMed ID: 11646758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The evanescence of living wills. Francis LP Real Property Probate Trust J; 1989; 24(1):141-64. PubMed ID: 11652557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Active euthanasia: can it be justified? Molenda FA Euthan Rev; 1988; 3(1):15-43. PubMed ID: 11649265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The "small beginnings" of euthanasia: examining the erosion in legal prohibitions against mercy-killing. Koop CE; Grant ER Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):585-634. PubMed ID: 11650885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Family surrogate laws: a necessary supplement to living wills and durable powers of attorney. Hamann AA Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(1):103-77. PubMed ID: 11654083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Perspectives on Cruzan: the sirens' lure of invented consent -- a critique of autonomy-based surrogate decisionmaking for legally-incapacitated older persons. Bopp J; Avila D Hastings Law J; 1991 Mar; 42(3):779-815. PubMed ID: 11652587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The values history: a new standard of care. Rich BA Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1109-81. PubMed ID: 11652633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Missing persons: legal perceptions of incompetent patients. Dresser R Rutgers Law Rev; 1994; 46(2):609-719. PubMed ID: 11660406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests. Watson DE Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1147-81. PubMed ID: 11651439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]