363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652635)
1. State natural death acts: illusory protection of individuals' life-sustaining treatment decisions.
Lerner MJ
Harvard J Legis; 1992; 29(1):175-221. PubMed ID: 11652635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri.
Johnson SH
St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The living will: the epitome of human dignity in coping with the historical event of death.
Kutner L
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(4):661-86. PubMed ID: 11652520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The evanescence of living wills.
Francis LP
Real Property Probate Trust J; 1989; 24(1):141-64. PubMed ID: 11652557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A proposed amendment to the California Natural Death Act to assure the statutory right to control life sustaining treatment decisions.
Clementino BJ
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1983; 17(2):579-609. PubMed ID: 11649789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Justices find a right to die, but the majority sees need for clear proof of intent.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1990 Jun; ():A1, A18, A19. PubMed ID: 11646758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of the Cruzan case on the rights of elderly clients.
Gottlich V
Clgh Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 11652574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act: too little, too late?
Chapman MA
Ark Law Rev; 1989; 42(2):319-94. PubMed ID: 11653880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A comprehensive look at Connecticut's living will statute.
Lieberson A
Conn Probate Law J; 1992; 7(1):49-113. PubMed ID: 11653117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An overview of Georgia's living will legislation.
Adams CR; Adams CT
Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 36():45-75. PubMed ID: 11652443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The right of the elderly to self-determination and New York's legislative imperative.
Tomlinson AK
Pace Law Rev; 1988; 8(1):63-113. PubMed ID: 11650172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Liability for improper maintenance of life support: balancing patient and physician autonomy.
Addlestone SI
Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1993 Oct; 46(5):1255-81. PubMed ID: 11653092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Louisiana's Natural Death Act and dilemmas in medical ethics.
Vitiello M
LA Law Rev; 1985; 46(2):259-309. PubMed ID: 11649843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Maine's living will act and the termination of life-sustaining medical procedures.
Herlan ER
Maine Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):83-148. PubMed ID: 11652533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990.
Paris JJ; O'Connell KJ
Clin Ethics Rep; 1991; 5(3):1-10. PubMed ID: 11652594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Living wills in New York: are they valid?
Vile SE
Syracuse Law Rev; 1987; 38(4):1369-95. PubMed ID: 11650137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Death with dignity in Mississippi? An analysis of Mississippi's Natural Death Act.
Vitiello M
Miss Law J; 1984; 54(3&4):459-507. PubMed ID: 11652509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The living will.
Ifrah AJ
J Halacha Contemporary Society; 1992; No. 24():121-52. PubMed ID: 11652621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The right to die a natural death: a discussion of In re Quinlan and the California Natural Death Act.
Randall MW
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1977; 46(1):192-206. PubMed ID: 11661496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The limitations of legislation.
Orentlicher D
MD Law Rev; 1994; 53():1255-305. PubMed ID: 11657533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
