154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652673)
1. The right to die: state courts lead where legislatures fear to tread.
Hoefler JM; Kamoie BE
Law Policy; 1992 Oct; 14(4):337-80. PubMed ID: 11652673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An overview of Georgia's living will legislation.
Adams CR; Adams CT
Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 36():45-75. PubMed ID: 11652443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Judicial innovation and policy re-invention: state supreme courts and the right to die.
Glick HR
West Polit Q; 1992; ():71-92. PubMed ID: 11652627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri.
Johnson SH
St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The "right to die": a case study in American lawmaking.
Meisel A
Eur J Health Law; 1996 Mar; 3(1):49-74. PubMed ID: 11654848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A time to be born and a time to die: a pregnant woman's right to die with dignity.
Mulholland KA
Indiana Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):859-78. PubMed ID: 11652514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Living wills in New York: are they valid?
Vile SE
Syracuse Law Rev; 1987; 38(4):1369-95. PubMed ID: 11650137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Death with dignity in Mississippi? An analysis of Mississippi's Natural Death Act.
Vitiello M
Miss Law J; 1984; 54(3&4):459-507. PubMed ID: 11652509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The living will: the epitome of human dignity in coping with the historical event of death.
Kutner L
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(4):661-86. PubMed ID: 11652520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The evanescence of living wills.
Francis LP
Real Property Probate Trust J; 1989; 24(1):141-64. PubMed ID: 11652557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Incubator or individual?: the legal and policy deficiencies of pregnancy clauses in living will and advance health care directive statutes.
Burch TJ
MD Law Rev; 1995; 54(2):528-70. PubMed ID: 11653265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Right to die: a survey of legislative and judicial responses to life-support technology.
Richardson E
Glendale Law Rev; 1981-1982; 5(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 11652441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Maine's living will act and the termination of life-sustaining medical procedures.
Herlan ER
Maine Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):83-148. PubMed ID: 11652533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of the Cruzan case on the rights of elderly clients.
Gottlich V
Clgh Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 11652574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The right of the elderly to self-determination and New York's legislative imperative.
Tomlinson AK
Pace Law Rev; 1988; 8(1):63-113. PubMed ID: 11650172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Living will legislation in Colorado: an analysis of the Colorado Medical Treatment Decision Act in relation to similar developments in other jurisdictions.
Marsh LA
Denver Univ Law Rev; 1987; 64(1):5-31. PubMed ID: 11652504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act: too little, too late?
Chapman MA
Ark Law Rev; 1989; 42(2):319-94. PubMed ID: 11653880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. AIDS and living wills.
Kortlandt CE
AIDS Public Policy J; 1990; 5(4):157-66. PubMed ID: 11650975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Physician responsibility and the right to "death care": the call for physician-assisted suicide.
Hoehne JL
Drake Law Rev; 1993; 42(1):225-53. PubMed ID: 11652687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination.
Gilbert LJ
J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
