These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

842 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652704)

  • 21. Right-to-die damage actions: developments in the law.
    Miller DH
    Denver Univ Law Rev; 1988; 65(2-3):181-212. PubMed ID: 11659201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Baby's death in '92 still being fought: parents sue hospital over shutdown of life support equipment.
    Bruni F
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Mar; ():6. PubMed ID: 11647122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Model guidelines for the development of institutional policy on the termination of life support and commentary: Part I.
    Nelson LJ
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1989; 3(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11659129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Futility: the concept and its use -- an educational resource for ethics advisory committees.
    Nelson W; Durnan JR; Spritz N; Corsino B; Kantor J; Spaulding M; Bleck T; Martin L
    Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(3):19-26. PubMed ID: 11652971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Helping the hopelessly ill.
    Landsman RM
    Trusts Estates; 1988 Apr; 127(4):37-42. PubMed ID: 11652539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. MDs, lawyers probe ethical, legal issues in ending treatment.
    Bolsen B
    Am Med News; 1984 Apr; 27(13):11-3. PubMed ID: 11653535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. When critically ill patients refuse life-sustaining care.
    Franklin C; Weil MH
    Semin Anesth; 1991 Sep; 10(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 11651359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Advance medical directives: policy perspectives and practical experiences.
    Weinberg JK; Brod M
    J Ethics Law Aging; 1995; 1(1):15-35. PubMed ID: 11654484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Death with dignity in Mississippi? An analysis of Mississippi's Natural Death Act.
    Vitiello M
    Miss Law J; 1984; 54(3&4):459-507. PubMed ID: 11652509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cruzan II: a clear and convincing travesty.
    Bopp J; Avila D
    Natl Univ Law Rev; 1992 Apr; 1(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 11654704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Decisions for the dying: an empirical study of physicians' responses to advance directives.
    Zinberg JM
    Vt Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):445-91. PubMed ID: 11653869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The right to die: medico-legal implications of In re Quinlan.
    Hirsh HL; Donovan RE
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1977; 30(2):267-303. PubMed ID: 11661462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A good death: medical ethics grand rounds.
    Ram MD; Thompson JS; Kilner JF
    Hosp Pract; 1986 Apr; 21(4):31-32, 37-38+. PubMed ID: 11652500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Artificial nutrition and the terminally ill: how should Washington decide?
    Beatty JA
    Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):419-57. PubMed ID: 11652503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Second-generation advance directives: will reforming the law improve the practice?
    Keyserlingk EW
    Humane Med; 1993 Jan; 9(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 11652942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases.
    Bopp J; Coleson RE
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(4):821-46. PubMed ID: 11652997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Liability for improper maintenance of life support: balancing patient and physician autonomy.
    Addlestone SI
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1993 Oct; 46(5):1255-81. PubMed ID: 11653092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Judicial innovation and policy re-invention: state supreme courts and the right to die.
    Glick HR
    West Polit Q; 1992; ():71-92. PubMed ID: 11652627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
    Strasser M
    KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Consumer sovereignty vs. informed consent: saying no to requests to "do everything" for dying patients.
    Weber LJ
    Bus Prof Ethics J; 1990; 9(3 and 4):95-102. PubMed ID: 11651037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 43.