BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652794)

  • 1. Malpractice arising from negligent psychotherapy: ethical, legal, and clinical implications of Osheroff v. Chestnut Lodge.
    Packman WL; Cabot MG; Bongar B
    Ethics Behav; 1994; 4(3):175-97. PubMed ID: 11652794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Treatment choices and informed consent in psychiatry: implications of the Osheroff case for the profession.
    Malcolm JG
    J Psychiatry Law; 1986; 14(1-2):9-106. PubMed ID: 11658874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Informed consent to psychotherapy: recent developments.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 1997 Apr; 48(4):445-6. PubMed ID: 9090726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Group psychotherapy in bioethical perspective.
    Moreno JD
    J Group Psychother Psychodrama Sociom; 1991; 44(2):60-70. PubMed ID: 11659770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A survey of North Carolina's treatment of the doctrine of informed consent.
    Grubbs WG
    Wake Forest Law Rev; 1986; 21(3):757-77. PubMed ID: 11658959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tardive dyskinesia: medical facts and legal fictions.
    Taub S
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):833-75. PubMed ID: 11649880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana.
    Boland GL
    LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The liability of psychiatrists for malpractice.
    Cassidy PS
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1974; 36(1):108-37. PubMed ID: 11661219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of consultation in psychological practice: ethical, legal, and clinical considerations.
    Clayton S; Bongar B
    Ethics Behav; 1994; 4(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 11652713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An economic analysis of informed consent to medical care.
    Fajfar M
    Georgetown Law J; 1992 Jun; 80(5):1941-71. PubMed ID: 11659918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The tort liability of the psychiatrist.
    Fishalow SE
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1975; 3(4):191-230. PubMed ID: 1234518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Judicial review of medical treatment programs.
    Beresford HR
    Calif West Law Rev; 1976; 12(2):331-68. PubMed ID: 11664655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tort--informed consent--new directions for medical disclosure--Hopp v. Lepp and Reibl v. Hughes.
    Gochnauer M; Fleming DJ
    Univ B C Law Rev; 1981; 15(2):475-97. PubMed ID: 11658641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consent to medical treatment in Canada.
    Picard EI
    Osgoode Hall Law J; 1981 Mar; 19(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 11658624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comments on the Klerman-Stone debate on Osheroff v. Chestnut Lodge.
    Am J Psychiatry; 1991 Jan; 148(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 1984697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The psychiatric patient's right to effective treatment: implications of Osheroff v. Chestnut Lodge.
    Klerman GL
    Am J Psychiatry; 1990 Apr; 147(4):409-18. PubMed ID: 1969242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Torts--medical malpractice--Court of Appeals of Maryland adopts doctrine of informed consent.
    Penhallegon JR
    Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1978; 8(1):114-29. PubMed ID: 11664978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ethical and legal issues in e-mail therapy.
    Shapiro DE; Schulman CE
    Ethics Behav; 1996; 6(2):107-24. PubMed ID: 11654969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rogers v. Whitaker and informed consent in Australia: a fair dinkum duty of disclosure.
    Chalmers D; Schwartz R
    Med Law Rev; 1993; 1(2):139-59. PubMed ID: 11660490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The therapist's duty to protect third parties: a guide for the perplexed.
    George JE; Korin JB; Quattrone MS; Mandel JJ
    Rutgers Law J; 1983; 14(3):637-51. PubMed ID: 11658758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.