362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652795)
1. Process and detection in fraud and deceit.
Silverman S
Ethics Behav; 1994; 4(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 11652795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
Protti M
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
Fox MF
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions.
Fox MF; Braxton JM
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Teaching scientific integrity.
Gifford F
Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):297-314. PubMed ID: 11656760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Academics face abuse of rules designed to protect research.
Cowen RC
Christ Sci Monitor; 1998 Mar; ():13. PubMed ID: 11647561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Glory days or the lure of scientific misconduct.
Knoll E
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 11653392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Fraud will out--or will it?
Tangney JP
New Sci; 1987 Aug; 115(1572):62-3. PubMed ID: 11645775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB.
Hilgartner S
IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fraud and trust in science.
Fuchs S; Westervelt SD
Perspect Biol Med; 1996; 39(2):248-69. PubMed ID: 8820540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The politics of research misconduct: congressional oversight, universities, and science.
LaFollette MC
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):261-85. PubMed ID: 11653364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fraud and misconduct in clinical research.
Wells F
Account Res; 1997; 5(1-3):25-38. PubMed ID: 11654814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The assault on David Baltimore.
Kevles DJ
New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Her study shattered the myth that fraud in science is a rarity.
Altman LK
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():C3. PubMed ID: 11647002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fraud in research, 1986-1992: an annotated bibliography.
Anderson J
J Infor Ethics; 1994; 3(2):64-89. PubMed ID: 11656481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Whistleblowing in biomedical research: report from a workshop.
Mishkin B
IRB; 1982 Feb; 4(2):8-9. PubMed ID: 11658314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reply to Ernhart, Scarr, and Geneson.
Needleman HL
Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 11653084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Science, journalism, and whistle-blowing.
Koshland DE
Science; 1988 Apr; 240(4852):585. PubMed ID: 11644303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Science police.
Dolnick E
Discover; 1994 Feb; 15(2):56-63. PubMed ID: 11653089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The demise of the social contract for science: misconduct in science and the nonmodern world.
Guston DH
Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):215-48. PubMed ID: 11656758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
