496 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652819)
1. Paternalism, civil commitment and illness politics: assessing the current debate and outlining a future direction.
Arrigo BA
J Law Health; 1992-1993; 7(2):131-68. PubMed ID: 11652819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Refusal of medical treatment in "captive" circumstances.
Somerville MA
Can Bar Rev; 1985; 63():59-90. PubMed ID: 11660372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Mandatory hospitalisation in mental health.
Mordini E
Bull Med Ethics; 1997 Nov; No. 133():18-21. PubMed ID: 11655252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy.
Brooks AD
Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values.
Schwartz SJ; Costanzo CE
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 20(4):1329-429. PubMed ID: 11658983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The continuum of coercion: constitutional and clinical considerations in the treatment of mentally disordered persons.
Miller RD
Denver Univ Law Rev; 1997; 74(4):1169-214. PubMed ID: 11660618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.
Roth LH
Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Report of the U.S. Delegation to Assess Recent Changes in Soviet Psychiatry.
United States Delegation to Assess Recent Changes in Soviet Psychiatry
Schizophr Bull; 1990 Apr; 15(4 Suppl):1-79. PubMed ID: 11659290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Parens patriae "treatment": legal punishment in disguise.
Coleman L; Solomon T
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):345-62. PubMed ID: 11664728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Stromberg CD; Stone AA
Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications.
Parry JW
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The importance of establishing competence in cases involving the involuntary administration of psychotropic medications.
Knepper K
Law Psychol Rev; 1996; 20():97-137. PubMed ID: 11656625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethical issues in inpatient practice.
Sider RC
Psychiatr Med Update Mass Gen Hosp Rev Physicians; 1986; 4(4):445-54. PubMed ID: 11659331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychiatric care and the law of substitute decision-making.
Parry J
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1987; 11(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 11658868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Civil commitment in Wisconsin: the impact of Lessard v. Schmidt.
Zander TK
Wis L Rev; 1976; 1976(2):503-62. PubMed ID: 11664748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The right to "just say no": a history and analysis of the right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
Cichon DE
LA Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 53(2):283-426. PubMed ID: 11657118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Rights within the therapeutic relationship.
King P
J Law Health; 1991-1992; 6(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11659514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Involuntary treatment: civilly committed patients may be involuntarily medicated; involuntary medication to restore competence to stand trial requires judicial approval.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(3):493-4. PubMed ID: 11645181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Revising Pennsylvania's involuntary civil commitment statute.
Vater JA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1975; 37(1):180-93. PubMed ID: 11664513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
Parry J
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
