These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652821)
1. Senate Bill 1, Ohio's advance directives law: where have we been...where are we going? Hillman JM J Law Health; 1992-1993; 7(2):295-320. PubMed ID: 11652821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Living wills: the need for uniform state laws. Warnock HC Probate Prop; 1991; 5(3):52-6. PubMed ID: 11652620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical treatment rights of older persons and persons with disabilities. National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and Disabled Clgh Rev; 1992 Jan; 25(9):1204-17. PubMed ID: 11659393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Protecting the right to die: the Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990. Mulholland KC Harvard J Legis; 1991; 28(2):609-30. PubMed ID: 11651225 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Practicing the PSDA. Rouse F; Johnson S; Brock DW; Emanuel L; Wolf SM; Mason D; Mezey M; Purtilo RB; McCloskey EL Hastings Cent Rep; 1991; 21(5):S1-16. PubMed ID: 11642934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Right to die: a survey of legislative and judicial responses to life-support technology. Richardson E Glendale Law Rev; 1981-1982; 5(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 11652441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan. Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act. New Jersey N J Statut Annot N J; 1991 Jul; Chapt. 201 Sects. 26.2H.53 to 26.2H.78():26:2H-53 to 26:2H-78. PubMed ID: 12043617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Judicial innovation and policy re-invention: state supreme courts and the right to die. Glick HR West Polit Q; 1992; ():71-92. PubMed ID: 11652627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of the Cruzan case on the rights of elderly clients. Gottlich V Clgh Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 11652574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act: too little, too late? Chapman MA Ark Law Rev; 1989; 42(2):319-94. PubMed ID: 11653880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill. Eisenberg KG Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Living will statutes: the first decade. Gelfand G Wis L Rev; 1987; 5(5):737-822. PubMed ID: 11650367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Artificial nutrition and the terminally ill: how should Washington decide? Beatty JA Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):419-57. PubMed ID: 11652503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Cruzan legacy: legislative and judicial responses and insights for the future. Gieszl HC; Velasco PA Ariz State Law J; 1992; 24(2):719-801. PubMed ID: 11654081 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. AIDS and living wills. Kortlandt CE AIDS Public Policy J; 1990; 5(4):157-66. PubMed ID: 11650975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Proxy decisionmaking for the terminally ill: the Virginia approach. O'Shaughnessy WJ Va Law Rev; 1984 Sep; 70(6):1269-302. PubMed ID: 11652483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law. Tarantino LM Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]