These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652852)
1. Of mice and machine: a paradigmatic challenge to interpretation of the patent statute. Chiapetta JR William Mitchell Law Rev; 1994; 20(1):155-90. PubMed ID: 11652852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The brave new world of animal biotechnology. Project report. Donnelley S; McCarthy CR; Singleton R Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(1 Suppl):S1-31. PubMed ID: 11654088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Biotechnology patenting: the wicked animal must defend itself. Crespi S Eur Intellect Prop Rev; 1995 Sep; 17(9):431-41. PubMed ID: 11654979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Animals as inventions: biotechnology and intellectual property rights. Sagoff M Rep Inst Philos Public Policy; 1996; 16(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 11654360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Patenting life: biotechnology, intellectual property, and environmental ethics. Hettinger N Boston Coll Environ Aff Law Rev; 1995; 22(2):267-305. PubMed ID: 11656671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medicine, animal experimentation, and the moral problem of unfortunate humans. Frey RG Soc Philos Policy; 1996; 13(2):181-211. PubMed ID: 11653298 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The ethics of patenting higher life forms. Hoffmaster B Intellect Prop J; 1988; 4():1-24. PubMed ID: 11652586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Owning our bodies: an examination of property law and biotechnology. Gold R San Diego Law Rev; 1995; 32(4):1167-247. PubMed ID: 11656846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Living inventions: animal patenting in the United States and Europe. Nelkin D Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1992-1993 Winter; 4():203-10. PubMed ID: 11652651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Intellectual property in higher life forms: the patent system and controversial technologies. Merges RP MD Law Rev; 1988; 47(4):1051-75. PubMed ID: 16514761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Vital essences and human wholeness: the social readings of biological information. Kevles DJ South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):255-78. PubMed ID: 11645834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Proprietary rights and the norms of science in biotechnology research. Eisenberg RS Yale Law J; 1987 Dec; 97(2):177-231. PubMed ID: 11660398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Europe debates the ownership of life. MacKenzie D New Sci; 1992 Jan; 133(1802):9-10. PubMed ID: 11656130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Draft report to annual and central conferences, Dec 1990: an invitation to explore a frontier. United Methodist Church. Genetic Science Task Force Engage Soc Action; 1991 Jan; 4(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 11659313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Selective breeding and the patenting of living organisms. Blunt P Syracuse Law Rev; 1998; 48(3):1365-90. PubMed ID: 11657454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Patentability of genetic inventions in animals. Moufang R IIC Int Rev Ind Prop Copyr Law; 1989; 20(6):823-46. PubMed ID: 11650905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Patenting transgenic human embryos: a nonuse cost perspective. Burk DL Houst Law Rev; 1993; 30(4):1597-669. PubMed ID: 11659869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Patenting life. Kass LR Commentary; 1981 Dec; 72(6):45-57. PubMed ID: 11649383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Toward the right of commerciality: recognizing property rights in the commercial value of human tissue. Hardiman R UCLA Law Rev; 1986 Oct; 34(1):207-64. PubMed ID: 11659048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]