These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652866)
21. In re Fiori. Pennsylvania. Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County Pa Dist Cty Rep; 1993 Feb; 17():558-65. PubMed ID: 12041328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Appointing a proxy under the best of circumstances. White PD Utah Law Rev; 1992; 1992(3):849-60. PubMed ID: 11656534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Live or let die; who decides an incompetent's fate? In re Storar and In re Eichner. Bates KW Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(2):387-400. PubMed ID: 11655681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Taking hostages: the Linares case. Miles SH Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(4):4. PubMed ID: 11650223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The role of the family in medical decisionmaking for incompetent adult patients: a historical perspective and case analysis. Krasik EB Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1987; 48(2):539-618. PubMed ID: 11658944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. MDs, lawyers probe ethical, legal issues in ending treatment. Bolsen B Am Med News; 1984 Apr; 27(13):11-3. PubMed ID: 11653535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria? Longino PH Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):377-407. PubMed ID: 11658479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. 'Right-to-die' theory upheld in New Jersey. Rust M Am Med News; 1985 Feb; 28(5):1, 23. PubMed ID: 11653617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Physician willingness to withhold tube feeding after Cruzan: an empirical study. Peters PG; Ely JW; Zweig SC; Elder NC; Schneider FD Miss Law Rev; 1992; 57():831-48. PubMed ID: 11654076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. In the Matter of the Conservatorship of Rudolfo Torres Conservatee. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1985 Nov; 1(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 11644499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act. New Jersey N J Statut Annot N J; 1991 Jul; Chapt. 201 Sects. 26.2H.53 to 26.2H.78():26:2H-53 to 26:2H-78. PubMed ID: 12043617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. I.V. withdrawal: the severance of medicine's or society's umbilical cord? Barber v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 137 Cal.App.3d 1006, 195 Cal.Rptr. 484 (1983). Chrisman JP Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):941-72. PubMed ID: 11652480 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Decision on feeding tube sought in test case. Rust M Am Med News; 1985 May; 28(19):1, 33-34. PubMed ID: 11653667 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Withholding life-prolonging medical treatment from the institutionalized person--who decides? Corbett KA; Raciti RM New Engl J Prison Law; 1976; 3(1):47-83. PubMed ID: 11664738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications. Parry JW Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Decisions for the dying: an empirical study of physicians' responses to advance directives. Zinberg JM Vt Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):445-91. PubMed ID: 11653869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Uncharted law for a man between life and death. Hinds Md N Y Times Web; 1994 Jun; ():B9. PubMed ID: 11647032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Someone to watch over me: medical decision-making for hopelessly ill incompetent adult patients. Dippel DL Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):639-80. PubMed ID: 16144098 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Withholding treatment: reflections on the Dawson case. Browne A Can Fam Physician; 1983 Aug; 29():1413-4. PubMed ID: 11658543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Should Paul Brophy have been allowed to die? Drinan RF America (NY); 1986 Nov; 155(15):324-325, 332. PubMed ID: 11658771 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]