284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652884)
1. Institutional ethics: hospital practices and policies for denying life-sustaining treatment.
Ross J; Wenger N
Whittier Law Rev; 1994; 15(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 11652884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Stopping treatment on grounds of futility: a role for institutional policy.
Stell LK
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):481-97. PubMed ID: 11652704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The right to die: medico-legal implications of In re Quinlan.
Hirsh HL; Donovan RE
Rutgers Law Rev; 1977; 30(2):267-303. PubMed ID: 11661462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Foregoing nutrition and hydration.
Nelson LJ
Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 Jan; 1(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 11652511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Futility: the concept and its use -- an educational resource for ethics advisory committees.
Nelson W; Durnan JR; Spritz N; Corsino B; Kantor J; Spaulding M; Bleck T; Martin L
Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(3):19-26. PubMed ID: 11652971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. MDs, lawyers probe ethical, legal issues in ending treatment.
Bolsen B
Am Med News; 1984 Apr; 27(13):11-3. PubMed ID: 11653535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A good death: medical ethics grand rounds.
Ram MD; Thompson JS; Kilner JF
Hosp Pract; 1986 Apr; 21(4):31-32, 37-38+. PubMed ID: 11652500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. I.V. withdrawal: the severance of medicine's or society's umbilical cord? Barber v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 137 Cal.App.3d 1006, 195 Cal.Rptr. 484 (1983).
Chrisman JP
Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):941-72. PubMed ID: 11652480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):331-42. PubMed ID: 11651817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Death, dying and the law: a prosecutorial view of the Quinlan case.
Collester DG
Rutgers Law Rev; 1977; 30(2):304-28. PubMed ID: 11661463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Neurologists and the hospital ethics committee.
Cranford RE; Jackson DL
Semin Neurol; 1984 Mar; 4(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 11649663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Care of the hopelessly ill.
Paris JJ; Varga AC
America (NY); 1984 Sep; 151(7):141-4. PubMed ID: 11658463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Institutional ethics committee's roles, responsibilities, and benefits for physicians.
Minnesota Medical Association. Committee on Ethics and Medical-Legal Affairs
Minn Med; 1985 Aug; 68(8):605, 607-612. PubMed ID: 11643801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Legal perspectives on institutional ethics committees.
Capron AM
J Coll Univ Law; 1985; 11(4):417-31. PubMed ID: 11651865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection.
Smith SR
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act.
New Jersey
N J Statut Annot N J; 1991 Jul; Chapt. 201 Sects. 26.2H.53 to 26.2H.78():26:2H-53 to 26:2H-78. PubMed ID: 12043617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan.
Bennett SA
Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The tort liability of hospital ethics committees.
Merritt AL
South Calif Law Rev; 1987 Jul; 60(5):1239-97. PubMed ID: 11658947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Decisions for the dying: an empirical study of physicians' responses to advance directives.
Zinberg JM
Vt Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):445-91. PubMed ID: 11653869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. One decision: a case study.
Med World News; 1983 Jun; 24(11):18-9. PubMed ID: 11645499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
