266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652936)
1. Physician self-referral and joint venture prohibitions: necessary shield against abusive practices or overregulation?
Baumgartner MR
J Corp Law; 1994; 19(2):313-52. PubMed ID: 11652936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethical and legal remedies to over-utilization of health care resources.
Verdirame KM
Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 25(4):1537-80. PubMed ID: 11654462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The physician as entrepreneur: state and federal restrictions on physician joint ventures.
Puryear JH
North Carol Law Rev; 1994 Nov; 73(1):293-328. PubMed ID: 11660072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The patient has not been informed: a proposal for a physician conflict of interest disclosure law.
Michna C
Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1993; 27(2):495-528. PubMed ID: 11659864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. What market values are doing to medicine.
Relman AS
Atlantic; 1992 Mar; 269(3):98-102, 105-106. PubMed ID: 11651349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Doctors warned on conflicts of interest.
Pear R
N Y Times Web; 1991 Sep; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11646879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. When healers are entrepreneurs: a debate over costs and ethics.
Pear R; Eckholm E
N Y Times Web; 1991 Jun; ():1, 30. PubMed ID: 11646855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. U.S. limits doctors in their referrals.
Pear R
N Y Times Web; 1991 Jul; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11646906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. For biggest hospital operator, a debate over ties that bind: the doctor as investor.
Gottlieb M; Eichenwald K; Barbanel J
N Y Times Web; 1997 Apr; ():1, 30. PubMed ID: 11647224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Financial incentives to limit services: should physicians be required to disclose these to patients?
McGraw DC
Georgetown Law J; 1995; 83():1821-47. PubMed ID: 11660268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Regulating the business of medicine: models for integrating ethics and managed care.
Regan AC
Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1997; 30(4):635-84. PubMed ID: 11660772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Autonomy and privacy: protecting patients from their physicians.
Bobinski MA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1994; 55(2):291-388. PubMed ID: 11659957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The corporate practice of medicine doctrine: an anachronism in the modern health care industry.
Chase-Lubitz JF
Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 40(2):445-88. PubMed ID: 11649888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Infertility: the market, the law, and the impact.
Rinehart LA
Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):77-106. PubMed ID: 11660337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Stark Law: boon or boondoggle? An analysis of the prohibition on physician self-referrals.
Wales SD
Law Psychol Rev; 2003; 27():1-28. PubMed ID: 16514757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Doctors' investments in home care grow, raising fears of ethical swamp.
Meier B
N Y Times Web; 1993 Mar; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. FDA issues concerning conflicts of interest.
Kurt TL
IRB; 1990; 12(5):6-9. PubMed ID: 11654003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. University physician-researcher conflicts of interest: the inadequacy of current controls and proposed reform.
Maatz CT
High Technol Law J; 1992; 7():137-88. PubMed ID: 11659962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Prohibition of financial arrangements and referrals.
New York
McKinneys Consol Laws N Y Annot N Y State; 1993 Mar; Sects. 238-a to 238-e():. PubMed ID: 12041362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. American doctors do not have to attend executions.
Rhein R
BMJ; 1993 Mar; 306(6881):813. PubMed ID: 11643119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
