These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652952)
1. Surrogate motherhood contracts: should the British or Canadian model fill the U.S. legislative vacuum? Serratelli A George Washington J Int Law Econ; 1993; 26(3):633-74. PubMed ID: 11652952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Surrogate motherhood: questions of law and values. Kopytoff BK Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1988; 22(2):205-49. PubMed ID: 11659158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Gestational surrogacy: unsettling state parentage law and surrogacy policy. Hofheimer A Rev Law Soc Change; 1992; 19(3):571-616. PubMed ID: 11659977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The surrogate mother contract: in the best interests of society? Latourette AW Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1990; 25(1):53-92. PubMed ID: 11651389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Conceiving for cash; is it legal?: a survey of the laws applicable to surrogate motherhood. Taylor S N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1987; 4(Part 2):413-44. PubMed ID: 11650203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative look at surrogacy. Feinerman JV Georgetown Law J; 1988 Jun; 76(5):1837-44. PubMed ID: 11649254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Surrogate motherhood and the baby-selling laws. Katz A Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1986; 20(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11658800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Contracts to bear a child: the mixed legislative signals. Wadlington WJ Ida Law Rev; 1992-1993; 29(2):383-410. PubMed ID: 11652308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. New reproductive technologies in Canada and the United States: same problems, different discourses. Young AH Temple Int Comp Law J; 1998; 12(1):43-85. PubMed ID: 11660812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Artificial conception: legislative approaches. Krause HD Fam Law Q; 1985; 19(3):185-206. PubMed ID: 11658752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Surrogacy -- Warnock and after. Foxcroft L Med Law Int; 1997; 2(4):337-55. PubMed ID: 11657579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Surrogacy legislation in California: proposals and commentary. Davis AD Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1994; 28(3):571-92. PubMed ID: 11655175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Perspectives on surrogate motherhood. Little MO Med Humanit Rev; 1995; 9(2):38-45. PubMed ID: 11653303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Surrogacy: for love but not for money? Anleu SR Gend Soc; 1992 Mar; 6(1):30-48. PubMed ID: 11659538 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Within the best interests of the child: the factor of parental status in custody disputes arising from surrogacy contracts. Russell IS J Fam Law; 1988-1989; 27(3):585-671. PubMed ID: 11650247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Surrogacy arrangements and the conflict of laws. Appleton SF Wis L Rev; 1990; 1990(2):399-482. PubMed ID: 11652060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act. Abbas J Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Does surrogacy have a future after Brazier? Freeman M Med Law Rev; 1999; 7(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 11658024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]