These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653005)

  • 1. Roe v. Wade: death warrant for homosexuals.
    Arcidi P
    Hum Life Rev; 1995; 21(1):101-2. PubMed ID: 11653005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trimesters and technology: revamping Roe v. Wade.
    Rhoden NK
    Yale Law J; 1986 Mar; 95(4):639-97. PubMed ID: 11655828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Living with Roe v. Wade.
    McConnell ML
    Commentary; 1990 Nov; 90(5):34-8. PubMed ID: 11656047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In search of the perfect child: genetic testing and selective abortion.
    Peters T
    Christ Century; 1996 Oct; 113(31):1034-7. PubMed ID: 11656621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A decision-theoretic reconstruction of Roe v. Wade.
    Lockhart T
    Public Aff Q; 1991 Jul; 5(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 11656064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A right without access? Payment for elective abortions after Maher v. Roe.
    Ryan JS
    Cap Univ Law Rev; 1978; 7(3):483-96. PubMed ID: 11663178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Roe v. Wade--the abortion decision--an analysis and its implications.
    Riggs T
    San Diego Law Rev; 1973 Jun; 10(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 11661026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What price perfection?
    New Sci; 1997 Feb; 153(2070):3. PubMed ID: 11656793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited.
    Smith PA
    Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The forest and the trees: Roe v. Wade and its critics.
    Heymann PB; Barzelay DE
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1973 Jul; 53(4):765-84. PubMed ID: 11663362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technological advances and Roe v. Wade: the need to rethink abortion law.
    Martyn K
    UCLA Law Rev; 1982; 29(5-6):1194-215. PubMed ID: 11655743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Good eggs, bad eggs: the growing power of prenatal genetic tests is raising thorny new questions about ethics, fairness and privacy.
    Golden F
    Time; 1999 Jan; 153(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 11656965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beyond abortion: human genetics and the new eugenics.
    Harding JR
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 1991; 18(1):471-512. PubMed ID: 11659992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The ideological context of the disability rights critique: where modernity and tradition meet.
    Dolgin J
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 2003; 30(2):343-61. PubMed ID: 15083834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Closing the circle of constitutional review from Griswold v. Connecticut to Roe v. Wade: an outline of a decision merely overruling Roe.
    Van Alstyne W
    Duke Law J; 1989 Dec; 1989(6):1677-88. PubMed ID: 11656009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Greco v. United States: a step forward or backward from Roe v. Wade?
    Kayne MS
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1996; 17(3):367-80. PubMed ID: 11863013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
    Hopkin WR
    Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rethinking Roe v. Wade.
    Wardle LD
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1985; 1985(2):231-64. PubMed ID: 11655792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Will there be a constitutional right to abortion after the reconsideration of Roe v. Wade?
    Bopp J
    J Contemp Law; 1989; 15(2):131-73. PubMed ID: 11655991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.