525 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653014)
1. Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions.
Charo RA
Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr; 8(Suppl. 1):148-59. PubMed ID: 11653014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion policy and women's health in developing countries.
Dixon-Mueller R
Int J Health Serv; 1990; 20(2):297-314. PubMed ID: 2332264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health.
Harrison LK; Naylor KL
Nurse Pract; 1991 Dec; 16(12):53-9. PubMed ID: 1798604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech, privacy, and the power of the purse: lessons from the abortion "gag rule" case.
Wing KR
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1992; 17(1):163-75. PubMed ID: 1619248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recent developments in abortion law in industrialized countries.
Boland R
Law Med Health Care; 1990; 18(4):404-18. PubMed ID: 2089193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. HIV and childbearing. 2. AIDS and reproductive decisions: having children in fear and trembling.
Arras JD
Milbank Q; 1990; 68(3):353-82. PubMed ID: 2266923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Antiprogestin drugs: ethical issues.
Macklin R
Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 1434763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Antiprogestin drugs: ethical, legal and medical issues.
Cook RJ; Grimes DA
Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 1434754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion and the law: the impact on hospital policy of the Roe and Doe decisions.
Kemp KA; Carp RA; Brady DW
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1976; 1(3):319-37. PubMed ID: 1022805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Potential Effects of
Hall TS
Am J Law Med; 2023 Jul; 49(2-3):359-373. PubMed ID: 38344784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproductive freedom, coercion and justice. Some ethical aspects of population policy and practice.
Brody EB
Soc Sci Med (1967); 1976; 10(11-12):553-7. PubMed ID: 1025710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Selective pregnancy reduction: medical attitudes, legal implications, and a viable alternative.
Gemmette EV
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1991; 16(2):383-95. PubMed ID: 1894927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethics and reproduction.
Macnaughton M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Apr; 162(4):879-82. PubMed ID: 2327460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Supreme Court upholds parental notice requirements.
Fam Plann Perspect; 1990; 22(4):177-81. PubMed ID: 2226749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Undue burden of abortion.
Charo A
Lancet; 1992 Jul; 340(8810):44. PubMed ID: 1351612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Huntington's disease: prenatal screening for late onset disease.
Post SG
J Med Ethics; 1992 Jun; 18(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 1535662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Psychiatrists and access to abortion.
Appelbaum PS
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1992 Oct; 43(10):967-8. PubMed ID: 1398580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18.
Ahmed A; Evans DP; Jackson J; Meier BM; Tomori C
J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):485-489. PubMed ID: 38088610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Ninth Amendment: An Underutilized Protection for Reproductive Choice.
Huff L
J Law Health; 2024; 37(2):105-126. PubMed ID: 38833598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion in nineteenth century America: a conflict between women and their physicians.
King CR
Womens Health Issues; 1992; 2(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 1628000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
