239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653053)
21. FDA revises informed consent regulations for emergency research.
Menasché A; Levine RJ
IRB; 1995; 17(5-6):19-22. PubMed ID: 11653359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Are clinical trials of cell transplantation for Duchenne muscular dystrophy ethical?
Cho MK
IRB; 1994; 16(1-2):12-5. PubMed ID: 11652321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Informed consent process and document is criticized in court.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1994 Dec; 9(12):4-5. PubMed ID: 11654162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Two agencies issue new policies on human subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1995 Nov; 10(11):3. PubMed ID: 11653342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The law of institutional review boards.
Robertson JA
UCLA Law Rev; 1980 Feb; 26(3):484-549. PubMed ID: 11661806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Human experimentation: the review process in practice.
Cowan DH
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Can a court order participation in research?
Holder AR
IRB; 1987; 9(4):8-9. PubMed ID: 11649949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Fetal experimentation and federal regulation.
Horan DJ
Villanova Law Rev; 1977 Jan; 22(2):325-56. PubMed ID: 11664796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Does radiation research in healthy children pose greater than minimal risk?
Keens TG; Oki GS; Gilsanz V; Roe TF; Goodman W; Tsang RC; Specker BL; Saenger EL
IRB; 1994; 16(5):5-10. PubMed ID: 11652793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Money is putting people at risk in biomedical research.
Andrews LB
Chron High Educ; 2000 Mar; 46(27):B1, B4-5. PubMed ID: 11657699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Human experimentation: the regulation controversy.
Society; 1975; 13(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11662982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Institutional review board becomes enmeshed in lawsuit.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1994 Nov; 9(11):4. PubMed ID: 11654163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Court tells jury to ignore human subject protection regulations.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1995 Mar; 10(3):4-5. PubMed ID: 11654195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Considering experimentation and elusive truth: informed consent made difficult.
Brodeur D
Issues (St Louis Mo); 1992; 7(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 11659444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. IRB review of adverse events in investigational drug studies.
Prentice ED; Gordon B
IRB; 1997; 19(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11656910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. An ethical evaluation of federal norms for fetal experimentation.
O'Rourke KD
Linacre Q; 1976 Feb; 43(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 11663671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Ethical issues in clinical neurological research.
Shore D; Berg K; Mullican C
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 11653329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The ethics of involving psychiatrically impaired persons in research.
DeRenzo EG
IRB; 1994; 16(6):7-9, 11. PubMed ID: 11659990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Proposal on waiver of informed consent poses major issues for research ethics.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1997 Sep; 12(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11660533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Safeguards questioned: some worry that policies to protect human research subjects may be inadequate.
Burd S
Chron High Educ; 1994 Feb; 40():30-1. PubMed ID: 11660767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
