These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653070)
61. Perna v. Pirozzi. New Jersey. Supreme Court Rep Cases Argued Determ Supreme Court N J N J Supreme Court; 1983 Mar; 92():446-66. PubMed ID: 12041106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Torts--medical malpractice--Court of Appeals of Maryland adopts doctrine of informed consent. Penhallegon JR Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1978; 8(1):114-29. PubMed ID: 11664978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. Haughian v. Paine. Canada. Saskatchewan. Court of Appeal Dom Law Rep; 1987 Apr; 37():624-49. PubMed ID: 12041073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. California Supreme Court expands the informed consent doctine; physicians have a duty to obtain an informed refusal: Truman v. Thomas. Cluff CA Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1980; 1980(4):933-47. PubMed ID: 11655722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. The expansion of liability for medical accidents: from negligence to strict liability by way of informed consent. Meisel A Neb Law Rev; 1977; 56(1):51-152. PubMed ID: 11664804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. A reversible decision on consent to sterilization. Lee S Law Q Rev; 1987 Oct; 103():513-5. PubMed ID: 16100807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. Consent to medical treatment in Canada. Picard EI Osgoode Hall Law J; 1981 Mar; 19(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 11658624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. Robinson v. Parrish. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit Fed Report; 1983 Dec; 720():1548-52. PubMed ID: 11648163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. An economic analysis of informed consent to medical care. Fajfar M Georgetown Law J; 1992 Jun; 80(5):1941-71. PubMed ID: 11659918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Boyer v. Smith. Pennsylvania. Superior Court Atl Report; 1985 Aug; 497():646-9. PubMed ID: 11648526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Informed consent for the man on the Clapham omnibus: an English cure for "the American disease". Miller FH West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):169-90. PubMed ID: 11649911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Informed consent does not demand full disclosure of risks. Brahams D Lancet; 1983 Jul; 2(8340):58. PubMed ID: 11644260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Informed consent in Texas: a proposal for reasonableness and predictability. Wallach DM; Berry SJ St Marys Law J; 1987 Nov; 18(3):835-82. PubMed ID: 11658921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. Informed consent and hospital's liability for honorary surgeon: an Australian decision. Brahams D Lancet; 1990 Apr; 335(8696):1027-8. PubMed ID: 1970074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Medical responsibility in the Libyan law. Benomran FA Med Law Int; 1994; 1(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 11652959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. Goellner v. Butler, 6 January 1988. United States. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():19-20. PubMed ID: 12289362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Placebos: a misbranding dilemma. Stachowski D Health (N Y); 1993; 40(1):102-18. PubMed ID: 11652319 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Informed consent in the prescription drug context: the special case. Tietz GF Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):367-417. PubMed ID: 11652502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Informed consent--a proposed standard for medical disclosure. N Y Univ Law Rev; 1973 Jun; 48(3):548-63. PubMed ID: 11664279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]