207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653077)
1. Persistent vegetative state.
Brahams D
Lancet; 1992 Dec 19-26; 340(8834-8835):1534-5. PubMed ID: 11653077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Therefore choose death?
Appelbaum PS; Klein JI
Commentary; 1986 Apr; 81(4):23-9. PubMed ID: 11658682
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Law Lords rule that Tony Bland does not create precedent.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1993 Feb; 306(6875):413-4. PubMed ID: 11643102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. House of Lords on care for dying.
Bull Med Ethics; 1994 Feb; No. 95():13-6. PubMed ID: 11652723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Tony Bland awaits final hearing.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1993 Jan; 306(6869):11-2. PubMed ID: 11643093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment of the terminally ill.
Bleich JD
Tradition; 1996; 30(3):51-87. PubMed ID: 11654463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Dangers of the Bland decision.
Cole AP; Duddington JG
Bull Med Ethics; 1993 Feb; No. 85():2. PubMed ID: 11652203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Difficult moral questions: may a husband end all care of his permanently unconscious wife?
Grisez G
Linacre Q; 1996 May; 63(2):41-6. PubMed ID: 11660200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of life judgments and medical indications.
Thomasma DC
Qual Life Cardiovasc Care; 1986; 2(3):113-8. PubMed ID: 11659003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. British judges cannot order doctors to treat.
Kessel R
Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(4):3-4. PubMed ID: 11643015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Criminal law--homicide--removal of intravenous feeding line from vegetative, comatose patient at family's request is not murder. Barber v. Superior Court, 147 Cal. App. 3d 1006, 195 Cal. Rptr. 484 (1983).
Crook RR
Cumberland Law Rev; 1984-1985; 15(1):225-37. PubMed ID: 11652439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Feeding the dying elderly.
Callahan D
Generations; 1985; 10(2):15-7. PubMed ID: 11658806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Guidelines are set for persistent vegetative state.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1994 Apr; 308(6936):1060. PubMed ID: 11644561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Attorneys debate treatment termination.
Rust M
Am Med News; 1984 Aug; 27(31):1, 30-31. PubMed ID: 11653613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Vital distinctions, mortal questions: debating euthanasia and health care costs.
Callahan D
Commonweal; 1988 Jul; 115(13):397-404. PubMed ID: 11652542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The doctor's dilemma: necessity and the legality of medical intervention.
Wilson W; Smith K
Med Law Int; 1995; 1(4):387-410. PubMed ID: 11660022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. I.V. withdrawal: the severance of medicine's or society's umbilical cord? Barber v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 137 Cal.App.3d 1006, 195 Cal.Rptr. 484 (1983).
Chrisman JP
Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):941-72. PubMed ID: 11652480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Taking hostages: the Linares case.
Miles SH
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(4):4. PubMed ID: 11650223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Is one allowed to stop artificial organs, allowing patients to die? Opposing physicians' and philosophers' views.
Kjellstrand CM; Dolan JM; Rachels J; Epstein FH
Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs; 1986; 32(2):671-87. PubMed ID: 11659046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Declared innocent?
Bridgeman J
Med Law Rev; 1995; 3(2):117-41. PubMed ID: 11656731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
