687 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653082)
41. Call for research misconduct agency.
White C
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1695. PubMed ID: 11645068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Research universities and scientific misconduct -- history, policies, and the future.
Steneck NH
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):310-30. PubMed ID: 11653367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Trouble in the laboratory: probing the science of a controversial paper.
Fackelmann KA
Sci News; 1990 Mar; 137(13):200-203, 205. PubMed ID: 11650334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Institutional policies for responding to allegations of research fraud.
Greene PJ; Durch JS; Horwitz W; Hooper VS
IRB; 1986; 8(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11653742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Scientists call for whistleblowers' charter.
Goldbeck-Wood S
BMJ; 1997 Nov; 315(7118):1252. PubMed ID: 11644976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Whistle blowing and countersuits: the President's Commission and fraudulent research.
Shannon TA
IRB; 1981; 3(7):6-7. PubMed ID: 11649398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Scientific misconduct: new court challenge for OSI.
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 Apr; 356(6369):466. PubMed ID: 11642987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. New charges hit Illmensee.
MacKenzie D
New Sci; 1984 May; 102(1412):3-4. PubMed ID: 11655608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Her study shattered the myth that fraud in science is a rarity.
Altman LK
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():C3. PubMed ID: 11647002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Scientific misconduct: the lessons of time. Commentary on "The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: scientific misconduct and beyond" (C. Pascal).
Chubin DE
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 11657857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. How congressional pressure shaped the 'Baltimore case'.
Friedly J
Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5277):873-5. PubMed ID: 8711476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. No misconduct or fraud in Baltimore case.
Anderson A
Nature; 1988 Dec; 336(6199):505. PubMed ID: 11644320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. A view of misconduct in science.
Racker E
Nature; 1989 May; 339(6220):91-3. PubMed ID: 2716839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Cheating in science and publishing.
Altman LK
CBE Views; 1981; 4(4):19-25. PubMed ID: 11649550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Scientific misconduct in US health service.
Choo V
Lancet; 1995 May; 345(8961):1359. PubMed ID: 11644692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Conduct unbecoming?
Weiss P
N Y Times Mag; 1989 Oct; ():40-41, 68-69, 95. PubMed ID: 11650263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Fraudbusters back at NIH.
Culliton BJ
Science; 1990 Jun; 48(4963):1599. PubMed ID: 11653895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Allegations of dishonesty in research and their treatment by American universities.
Mazur A
Minerva; 1989; 27(2-3):177-94. PubMed ID: 11654071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research.
Kuzma SM
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1992; 25(2):357-421. PubMed ID: 11651584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB.
Hilgartner S
IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
