651 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653092)
1. Liability for improper maintenance of life support: balancing patient and physician autonomy.
Addlestone SI
Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1993 Oct; 46(5):1255-81. PubMed ID: 11653092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Living wills in New York: are they valid?
Vile SE
Syracuse Law Rev; 1987; 38(4):1369-95. PubMed ID: 11650137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The living will.
Ifrah AJ
J Halacha Contemporary Society; 1992; No. 24():121-52. PubMed ID: 11652621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Beyond misguided paternalism: resuscitating the right to refuse medical treatment.
Malloy SE
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1998; 33():1035-91. PubMed ID: 11660805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision.
Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R
KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri.
Johnson SH
St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Protecting the right to die: the Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990.
Mulholland KC
Harvard J Legis; 1991; 28(2):609-30. PubMed ID: 11651225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A proposed amendment to the California Natural Death Act to assure the statutory right to control life sustaining treatment decisions.
Clementino BJ
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1983; 17(2):579-609. PubMed ID: 11649789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The right of elderly patients to refuse life-sustaining treatment.
Annas GJ; Glantz LH
Milbank Q; 1986; 64(Suppl. 2):95-162. PubMed ID: 11649886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Justices find a right to die, but the majority sees need for clear proof of intent.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1990 Jun; ():A1, A18, A19. PubMed ID: 11646758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A comprehensive look at Connecticut's living will statute.
Lieberson A
Conn Probate Law J; 1992; 7(1):49-113. PubMed ID: 11653117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The right of the elderly to self-determination and New York's legislative imperative.
Tomlinson AK
Pace Law Rev; 1988; 8(1):63-113. PubMed ID: 11650172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The values history: a new standard of care.
Rich BA
Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1109-81. PubMed ID: 11652633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. State natural death acts: illusory protection of individuals' life-sustaining treatment decisions.
Lerner MJ
Harvard J Legis; 1992; 29(1):175-221. PubMed ID: 11652635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990.
Paris JJ; O'Connell KJ
Clin Ethics Rep; 1991; 5(3):1-10. PubMed ID: 11652594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Advance directives and the pursuit of death with dignity: New Jersey's new legislation.
Cantor NL
Rutgers Law Rev; 1992; 44(2):335-403. PubMed ID: 11651452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law.
Allsopp ME
Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The limitations of legislation.
Orentlicher D
MD Law Rev; 1994; 53():1255-305. PubMed ID: 11657533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. An overview of Georgia's living will legislation.
Adams CR; Adams CT
Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 36():45-75. PubMed ID: 11652443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Sequential domination, autonomy and living wills.
Johnson SH
West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):113-37. PubMed ID: 11649909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
