651 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653092)
21. The living will: the epitome of human dignity in coping with the historical event of death.
Kutner L
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(4):661-86. PubMed ID: 11652520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Incubator or individual?: the legal and policy deficiencies of pregnancy clauses in living will and advance health care directive statutes.
Burch TJ
MD Law Rev; 1995; 54(2):528-70. PubMed ID: 11653265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Medical priority of patients' wishes.
Dickens BM
Humane Med; 1991; 7(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 11651307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The right to death.
Dworkin R
New York Rev Books; 1991 Jan; ():14-7. PubMed ID: 11653244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Living will statutes: the first decade.
Gelfand G
Wis L Rev; 1987; 5(5):737-822. PubMed ID: 11650367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. New York panel urges widening patients' rights.
Sullivan R
N Y Times Web; 1987 Sep; ():A1, B3. PubMed ID: 11646631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination.
Gilbert LJ
J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Maine's living will act and the termination of life-sustaining medical procedures.
Herlan ER
Maine Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):83-148. PubMed ID: 11652533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The Shulman case and the right to refuse treatment.
Sneiderman B
Humane Med; 1991; 7(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 11651301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The right to die.
Brennan C
New Law J; 1993 Jul; 143(6609):1041-2. PubMed ID: 11652271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Surrogate decision making for mentally incapacitated adults.
Nelson LJ; Golenski JD
Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 Feb-Mar-Apr; 1(2 3 & 4):1-28. PubMed ID: 11650108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Family matters: is big brother your next-of-kin?
Lomasky LE
Reason; 1990 Nov; 22(6):36-9. PubMed ID: 11652569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Perspectives on Cruzan: the sirens' lure of invented consent -- a critique of autonomy-based surrogate decisionmaking for legally-incapacitated older persons.
Bopp J; Avila D
Hastings Law J; 1991 Mar; 42(3):779-815. PubMed ID: 11652587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Death in the legislature: inventing legal tools for autonomy.
Sabatino CP
Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(2):309-39. PubMed ID: 11652237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The recent amendments to the Texas Natural Death Act: implications for health care providers.
Greenfield RE
St Marys Law J; 1986; 17(3):1003-51. PubMed ID: 11652489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Damage actions for nonconsensual life-sustaining medical treatment.
Dooling RP
St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):895-918. PubMed ID: 11649881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The Cruzan legacy: legislative and judicial responses and insights for the future.
Gieszl HC; Velasco PA
Ariz State Law J; 1992; 24(2):719-801. PubMed ID: 11654081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests.
Watson DE
Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1147-81. PubMed ID: 11651439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Louisiana's Natural Death Act and dilemmas in medical ethics.
Vitiello M
LA Law Rev; 1985; 46(2):259-309. PubMed ID: 11649843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Specific intent, substituted judgment and best interests: a nationwide analysis of an individual's right to die.
Delaney JJ
Pace Law Rev; 1991; 11(3):565-641. PubMed ID: 11651454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
