129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653142)
1. How did the male become the normative standard for clinical drug trials?
Scott JW
Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 11653142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. There is no women's health crisis.
Satel SL
Public Interest; 1998; 130():21-33. PubMed ID: 11658109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Gender, health, and human rights.
Cook RJ
Health Hum Rights; 1995; 1(4):350-66. PubMed ID: 10393793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical trials in pregnancy.
Frederiksen MC
Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 11653143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The invisible woman: gender bias in medical research.
Keville TD
Womens Rights Law Report; 1994; 15():123-42. PubMed ID: 11660409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. HIV, women, and access to clinical trials: tort liability and lessons from DES.
Mastroianni AC
Duke J Gend Law Policy; 1998; 5(1):167-91. PubMed ID: 11979601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Sex & gender: the politics, policy, and practice of medical research.
Keitt SK
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2003; 3(2):253-78. PubMed ID: 14577143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Enriching health care and health care research: a feminist perspective.
Jevne R; Oberle K
Humane Med; 1993 Jul; 9(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 11652188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Off the pedestal and into the arena: toward including women in experimental protocols.
Gorenberg H; White A
Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(1):205-46. PubMed ID: 11659599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Feminism's healing effect.
Bender L
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 11644537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Health, human rights and lesbian existence.
Miller AM; Rosga A; Satterthwaite M
Health Hum Rights; 1995; 1(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 11654448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Negotiating the relationship of HIV/AIDS to reproductive health and reproductive rights.
Gruskin S
Am Univ Law Rev; 1995; 44():1191-205. PubMed ID: 11653369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Women not shortchanged in trials?
Holden C
Science; 1997 Mar; 275(5306):1571-3. PubMed ID: 11644903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The sex-bias myth in medicine.
Kadar AG
Atl Mon; 1994 Aug; 274(2):66-70. PubMed ID: 11659876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Studies involving orphan products for treating/diagnosing women's diseases.
Haffner ME
Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 11653144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Wanted. Single, white male for medical research.
Dresser R
Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 1544796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Women of childbearing potential in clinical research: perspectives on NIH policy and liability issues.
Hayunga EG; Rothenberg KH; Pinn VW
Food Drug Cosmet Med Device Law Dig; 1996 Jan; 13(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 11660302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Up against eugenics: disabled women's challenge to receive reproductive health services.
Waxman BF
Sex Disabil; 1994; 12(2):155-71. PubMed ID: 11656410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The exclusion of pregnant, pregnable, and once-pregnable people (a.k.a. women) from biomedical research.
Merton V
Am J Law Med; 1993; 19(4):369-451. PubMed ID: 7942864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Belling the cat: clinical investigation in vulnerable populations (a good idea, but who's going to volunteer?).
Legato MJ
J Gend Specif Med; 1998; 1(2):12-3. PubMed ID: 11281004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
