These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653158)

  • 1. Posthumous reproduction.
    Robertson JA
    Indiana Law J; 1994; 69(4):1027-65. PubMed ID: 11653158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Posthumous autonomy revisited.
    Cate FH
    Indiana Law J; 1994; 69(4):1067-73. PubMed ID: 11653159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sperm as property.
    Steinbock B
    Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1995; 6(2):57-71. PubMed ID: 11655140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. American abortion law applied to new reproductive technology.
    Hemphill L
    Jurimetrics; 1992; 32(3):361-86. PubMed ID: 11656220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A time to be born and a time to die: a pregnant woman's right to die with dignity.
    Mulholland KA
    Indiana Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):859-78. PubMed ID: 11652514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hecht v. Superior Court: recognizing a property right in reproductive material.
    Collins JL
    Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1994-1995 Summer; 33(3):661-84. PubMed ID: 11660116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fatherhood from the grave: an analysis of postmortem insemination.
    Gilbert S
    Hofstra Law Rev; 1993; 22(2):521-65. PubMed ID: 11660123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The implications of Davis v. Davis for reproductive rights analysis.
    Prygoski PJ
    Tenn Law Rev; 1994; 61(2):609-46. PubMed ID: 11652933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Embryo transplant, parental conflict, and reproductive freedom: a prospective analysis of issues and arguments created by forthcoming technology.
    Coleman MN
    Hofstra Law Rev; 1987; 15(3):609-30. PubMed ID: 11659072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act.
    Abbas J
    Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incubator or individual?: the legal and policy deficiencies of pregnancy clauses in living will and advance health care directive statutes.
    Burch TJ
    MD Law Rev; 1995; 54(2):528-70. PubMed ID: 11653265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The sound of silence breaking: Catholic women, abortion, and the law.
    Phelps TG
    Tenn Law Rev; 1992; 59(3):547-69. PubMed ID: 11652638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medico-legal aspects of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer practice.
    Schenker JG; Frenkel DA
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1987 Jul; 41(7):405-13. PubMed ID: 11658938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alternative birth technologies: legal challenges.
    Capron AM
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):679-704. PubMed ID: 11659041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Artificial procreation, societal reconceptions: legal insight from France.
    Jones DJ
    Am J Comp Law; 1988; 36(3):525-45. PubMed ID: 11659138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Davis v. Davis: the applicability of privacy and property rights to the disposition of frozen preembryos in intrafamilial disputes.
    Muller RJ
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1993; 24(3):763-804. PubMed ID: 11659794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A womb of my own: a moral evaluation of Ohio's treatment of pregnant patients with living wills.
    Lederman AD
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1994; 45(1):351-77. PubMed ID: 11656507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The legal status of the embryo.
    Andrews LB
    Loyola Law Rev; 1986; 32(2):357-409. PubMed ID: 11658916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cruzan and the constitutional status of nontreatment decisions for incompetent patients.
    Robertson JA
    Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1139-202. PubMed ID: 11652580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The right to death.
    Dworkin R
    New York Rev Books; 1991 Jan; ():14-7. PubMed ID: 11653244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.